Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-mhpxw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T08:23:09.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comments on Mr. Storer's Paper

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Charles Morris
Charles Morris*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mr. Thomas Storer does not believe that a science of signs is of basic importance to philosophy, for philosophy, he holds, is not a formal or a factual science but an activity of clarifying meaning and building linguistic systems. I should like to defend the relevance to philosophy of a science of signs even when philosophy is so conceived, and then to question this conception of philosophy itself.

Type
Article Commentary
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , October 1948 , pp. 330 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Under the title of “Signs about Signs about Signs” I have given a critical analysis of a number of philosophical reactions to Signs, Language, and Behavior; the article will appear in the 1948 volume of Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.