Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-05T02:22:03.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: Clendinnen, Jackson, and Induction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Gary Jones
Gary Jones*
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , September 1979 , pp. 466 - 469
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clendinnen, F. J. (1966), “Induction and Objectivity.” Philosophy of Science, 33: 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clendinnen, F. J. (1970), “A Response to Jackson.” Philosophy of Science 37: 444–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clendinnen, F. J. (1977), “Inference, Practice and Theory.” Synthese, 34: 89–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, F. (1970a), “A Reply to ‘Induction and Objectivity’.” Philosophy of Science 37: 440–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, F. (1970b), “Reply to a Response.” Philosophy of Science 37: 449–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar