Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T22:22:08.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Embedding and Uniqueness in Relationist Theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Brent Mundy
Brent Mundy*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Syracuse University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Relationist theories of space or space-time based on embedding of a physical relational system A into a corresponding geometrical system B raise problems associated with the degree of uniqueness of the embedding. Such uniqueness problems are familiar in the representational theory of measurement (RTM), and are dealt with by imposing a condition of uniqueness of embeddings up to composition with an “admissible transformation” of the space B. Friedman (1983) presents an alternative treatment of the uniqueness problem for embedding relationist theories, developed independently of RTM. Friedman's approach differs from that of RTM in securing uniqueness by adding new primitives to the physical system A in contrast to the RTM approach which adds new axioms. Friedman's proposal has recently been developed and defended by Catton and Solomon (1988).

This method of solving the uniqueness problem is here argued to be substantially inferior to the RTM method, both in practice and in principle. In practice we find that in none of the concrete examples offered to illustrate the method is the uniqueness problem actually solved in general. Moreover we find that in the most interesting case (addition to the system A of a finite number of relations of finite degree) the method is in principle incapable of success for mathematical reasons. In addition to these technical difficulties there are compelling methodological reasons for preferring the RTM method to the method of adding primitives.

Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 102 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I would like to thank Catton and Solomon for sending me a copy of their paper prior to publication, and for some correspondence discussing certain of their claims. I would also like to thank an anonymous referee for exceptionally detailed and careful comments.

References

Auslander, L. and MacKenzie, R. E. (1977), Introduction to Differentiable Manifolds. Reprint. Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, L. M. (1970), Theory and Applications of Distance Geometry, 2d ed. New York: Chelsea.Google Scholar
Catton, P. and Solomon, G. (1988), “Discussion: Uniqueness of Embeddings and Space-Time Relationalism”, Philosophy of Science 55: 280–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, H. (1985), “Can We Dispense with Space-Time?”, in P. D. Asquith and P. Kitcher (eds.), PSA 1984, Vol. 2, East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 33–90.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1983), Foundations of Space-Time Theories: Relativistic Physics and Philosophy of Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Krantz, D.; Luce, R.; Suppes, P. and Tversky, A. (1971), Foundations of Measurement, vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Manders, K. (1982), “On the Space-Time Ontology of Physical Theories”, Philosophy of Science 49: 575–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundy, B. (1983), “Relational Theories of Euclidean Space and Minkowski Spacetime”, Philosophy of Science 50: 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundy, B. (1986a), “Embedding and Uniqueness in Relational Theories of Space”, Synthese 67: 383–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundy, B. (1986b), “On the General Theory of Meaningful Representation”, Synthese 67: 391–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundy, B. (1987a), “The Metaphysics of Quantity”, Philosophical Studies 51: 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundy, B. (1987b), “Faithful Representation, Physical Extensive Measurement Theory and Archimedean Axioms”, Synthese 70: 373–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundy, B. (1988), “Extensive Measurement and Ratio Functions”, Synthese 75: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundy, B. (1989a), “On Quantitative Relationist Theories”, Philosophy of Science 56: 582–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundy, B. (1989b), “Elementary Categorial Logic, Predicates of Variable Degree, and Theory of Quantity”, Journal of Philosophical Logic 18: 115–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1946), “On the Theory of Scales of Measurement”, Science 103: 677–680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suppes, P. (1973), “Some Open Problems in the Philosophy of Space and Time”, in P. Suppes (ed.), Space, Time, and Geometry. Dordrecht: Reidel. pp. 383–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Fraassen, B. (1973), “Earman on the Causal Theory of Time”, in P. Suppes (ed.), Space, Time, and Geometry. Dordrecht: Reidel. pp. 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar