Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T06:44:28.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Embodiment, Interaction, and Experience: Toward a Comprehensive Model in Addiction Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Nicholas Zautra
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Current theories of addiction try to explain what addiction is, who experiences it, why it occurs, and how it develops and persists. In this article, I explain why none of these theories can be accepted as a comprehensive model. I argue that current models fail to account for differences in embodiment, interaction processes, and the experience of addiction. To redress these limiting factors, I design a proposal for an enactive account of addiction that follows the enactive model of autism proposed by Hanne De Jaegher.

Type
Cognitive Science
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 82 , Issue 5 , December 2015 , pp. 1023 - 1034
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I would like to thank Randall Beer, Shane Zappettini, Anastasia Nikoulina, Eran Magnon, Dan Qaurooni, Evan Arnet, and the participants at the PSA 2014 “Contributed Papers: Psychiatry” session for valuable discussion and feedback.

References

Anonymous, Alcoholics. 2001. Alcoholics Anonymous. 4th ed. New York: A. A. World Services.Google Scholar
Berridge, Kent C., and Robinson, Terry E.. 1995. “The Mind of an Addicted Brain: Neural Sensitization of Wanting versus Liking.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 4 (3): 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cawley, John, Markowitz, Sara, and Tauras, John. 2004. “Lighting Up and Slimming Down: The Effects of Body Weight and Cigarette Prices on Adolescent Smoking Initiation.” Journal of Health Economics 23 (2): 293–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chanon, Vicki W., Sours, Chandler R., and Boettiger, Charlotte A.. 2010. “Attentional Bias toward Cigarette Cues in Active Smokers.” Psychopharmacology 212 (3): 309–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colombetti, Giovanna. 2013. “Psychopathology and the Enactive Mind.” In Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Psychiatry, ed. Fulford, K. W. M., Davies, Martin, Gipps, Richard, Graham, George, Sadler, John, Stanghellini, Giovanni, and Thornton, Tim, 1083–1102. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crews, Fulton Timm, and Boettiger, Charlotte Ann. 2009. “Impulsivity, Frontal Lobes and Risk for Addiction.” Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 93 (3): 237–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Jaegher, Hanne. 2013. “Embodiment and Sense-Making in Autism.” Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 7:15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Jaegher, Hanne, and Paolo, Ezequiel Di. 2007. “Participatory Sense-Making.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (4): 485–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fidler, J. A., and West, R.. 2011. “Enjoyment of Smoking and Urges to Smoke as Predictors of Attempts and Success of Attempts to Stop Smoking: A Longitudinal Study.” Drug and Alcohol Dependence 115:30–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuchs, Thomas. 2010. “Phenomenology and psychopathology.” In Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science, ed. Gallagher, S. and Schmicking, D., 546–73. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Heyman, Gene M. 2009. Addiction: A Disorder of Choice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jellinek, Elvin Morton. 1960. The Disease Concept of Alcoholism. New Haven, CT: Hillhouse.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leshner, Alan I. 1997. “Addiction Is a Brain Disease, and It Matters.” Science 278 (5335): 45–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovaas, Ivar, Newsom, Crighton, and Hickman, Carol. 1987. “Self-Stimulatory Behavior and Perceptual Reinforcement.” Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 20 (1): 45–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKillop, James, Amlung, Michael T., Few, Lauren R., Ray, Lara A., Sweet, Lawrence H., and Munafò, Marcus R.. 2011. “Delayed Reward Discounting and Addictive Behavior: A Meta-analysis.” Psychopharmacology 216 (3): 305–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthews, Eric. 2010. “Explaining Addiction.” Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 17 (1): 23–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maturana, Humberto R. 1980. Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science; 42. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCusker, Christopher G. 2001. “Cognitive Biases and Addiction: An Evolution in Theory and Method.” Addiction 96 (1): 47–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGann, Marek, de Jaegher, Hanne, and Paolo, Ezequiel Di. 2013. “Enaction and Psychology.” Review of General Psychology 17 (2): 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NIDA (National Institute on Drug Abuse). 2014. “Drugs, Brains, and Behavior: The Science of Addiction.” http://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugs-brains-behavior-science-addiction/preface.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Lynn E., Berry, Jack W., Inaba, Darryl, Weiss, Joseph, and Morrison, Andrea. 1994. “Shame, Guilt, and Depression in Men and Women in Recovery from Addiction.” Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 11 (6): 503–10.Google ScholarPubMed
Pickard, Hanna. 2012. “The Purpose in Chronic Addiction.” AJOB Neuroscience 3 (2): 40–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, and Pickard, Hanna. 2013. “What Is Addiction?” In Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Psychiatry, ed. Fulford, K. W. M., Davies, Martin, Gipps, Richard, Graham, George, Sadler, John, Stanghellini, Giovanni, and Thornton, Tim, 851–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Evan. 2007. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Varela, F. I., Thompson, E., and Rosch, E.. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, R. 2013. EMCDDA INSIGHTS—Models of Addiction. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Wise, Roy A., and Bozarth, Michael A.. 1987. “A Psychomotor Stimulant Theory of Addiction.” Psychological Review 94 (4): 469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yalachkov, Yavor, Kaiser, Jochen, and Naumer, Marcus J.. 2010. “Sensory and Motor Aspects of Addiction.” Behavioural Brain Research 207 (2): 215–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar