Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-04T04:08:44.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explanation and Description-Relativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Thomas Nickles
Thomas Nickles*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , September 1973 , pp. 408 - 414
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Churchland, P. M. “The Logical Character of Action-Explanations.” Philosophical Review LXXIX (1970): 214–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Davidson, D. “The Logical Form of Action Sentences.” The Logic of Decision and Action. Edited by Rescher, N. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1967.Google Scholar
[3] Davidson, D. “The Individuation of Events.” Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel. Edited by N. Rescher, et al. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1969.Google Scholar
[4] Hempel, C. G. Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press, 1965.Google Scholar
[5] Hempel, C. G. “Aspects of Scientific Explanation,” in [4].Google Scholar
[6] Hempel, C. G. “Maximal Specificity and Lawlikeness in Probabilistic Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 35 (1968): 116–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Hempel, C. G. and Oppenheim, P. “Studies in the Logic of Explanation.” Reprinted in [4]. (Originally published in 1948.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Nickles, T. “Covering Law Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 38 (1971): 542–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Scheffler, I. The Anatomy of Inquiry. New York: Bobbs–Merrill, 1963.Google Scholar
[10] Shorter, J. M. “Causality, and a Method of Analysis.” Analytical Philosophy, Second Series. Edited by R. J. Butler. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1965.Google Scholar
[11] Steinberg, D. “Discussion: Nickles on Intensionality and the Covering Law Model.” Philosophy of Science 40 (1973): 403–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Vendler, Z. “Effects, Results, and Consequences.” Analytical Philosophy, First Series. Edited by R. J. Butler. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1962.Google Scholar