Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T16:28:39.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Foundations of Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Dayton Phillips
Dayton Phillips*
Affiliation:
Stanford University, Calif.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

W. H. Sheldon has recently remarked that philosophical naturalism of the type propounded by John Dewey and his followers boils down to materialism in a new guise. Of course, any effort to relate human experience to the physical world within which it arises is open to the general charge of “materialism.” But naturalism can be called “materialistic” in a more specific sense if it tends to pass cavalierly over those aspects of experience upon which older philosophers have based a sharp contrast between experience and nature. This, I take it, is the primary complaint against recent naturalism, and it has its roots, I believe, in the influence of modern psychological theory upon philosophical thought.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , April 1946 , pp. 150 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Sheldon, W. H., “Critique of Naturalism,” The Journal of Philosophy, XLII (1945), p. 254.Google Scholar

2 Sherrington, C. S., The Integrative Action of the Nervous System (New Haven: Yale, 1906).Google Scholar

3 Woodworth, R. S., “Gestalt Psychology and the Concept of Reaction Stages,” Psychological Issues (N. Y.: Columbia, 1939), p. 144.Google Scholar

4 Köhler, W., Gestalt Psychology (N. Y.: Liveright, 1929), p. 67.Google Scholar

5 Köhler, W., “Max Wertheimer,” The Psychological Review, XLI (1944), p. 145.Google Scholar

6 Hull, C. L., Principles of Behavior (N. Y.: Appleton, 1943), pp. 47, 385.Google Scholar

7 Miller, H. R., Central Autonomic Regulations in Health and Disease (N. Y.: Grune & Stratton, 1942), p. 30.Google Scholar

8 Morgan, C. T., Physiological Psychology (N. Y.: McGraw-Hill, 1942), p. 80.Google Scholar

9 Ranson, S. W., The Anatomy of the Nervous System, Fourth ed. (Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1943), p. 307.Google Scholar

10 Loc. cit., p. 302.Google Scholar

11 Morgan, op. cit., p. 371.Google Scholar

12 Symonds, P., “Presidential Address to the Psychiatric Section of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1944,” quoted in Personality and Behavior Disorders, J. McV. Hunt, Ed. (N. Y.: Ronald, 1944), vol. I, p. 574.Google Scholar

13 Morgan, op. cit., p. 461.Google Scholar

14 Loc. cit., p. 362.Google Scholar

15 Ranson, op. cit., p. 307.Google Scholar

16 Woodworth, R. S., “Situation-and-Goal Set,” Psychological Issues (N. Y.: Colombia, 1939), p. 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Loc. cit., pp. 158–9.Google Scholar

18 Herrick, C. J., “The Natural History of Experience,” Philosophy of Science, XII (1945), pp. 60–61.Google Scholar

19 Rappaport, D., Emotions and Memory (Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1942), p. 112.Google Scholar

20 Bartlett, F. C., Remembering (N. Y.: Macmillan, 1932), p. 213.Google Scholar