Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T05:21:42.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gauge Principles, Gauge Arguments and the Logic of Nature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Christopher A. Martin
Christopher A. Martin*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
*
Send requests for reprints to the author, 130 Goodbody Hall, Bloomington IN 47405; cam@indiana.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I consider the question of how literally one can construe the “gauge argument,” which is the canonical means of understanding the putatively central import of local gauge symmetry principles for fundamental physics. As I argue, the gauge argument must be afforded (at best) a heuristic reading. Claims to the effect that the argument reflects a deep “logic of nature” must, for numerous reasons I discuss, be taken with a grain of salt.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 69 , Issue S3 , September 2002 , pp. S221 - S234
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitchison, I. J. R., and Hey, A. J. G. (1989), Gauge Theories in Particle Physics. Bristol: IOP Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auyang, S. (1995), How is Quantum Field Theory Possible? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bleecker, D. (1981), Gauge Theory and Variational Principles. Reading: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Brown, H. (1999), “Aspects of Objectivity in Quantum Mechanics”, in Butterfield, J. and Pagonis, C. (eds.), From Physics to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cornwall, J., Levin, D., and Tiktopoulos, G. (1974), “Derivation of Gauge Invariance from High-energy Unitarity Bounds on the S-Matrix”, Derivation of Gauge Invariance from High-energy Unitarity Bounds on the S-Matrix 10(4): 1145–1167.Google Scholar
Deser, S. (1970), “Self-Interaction and Gauge Invariance”, Self-Interaction and Gauge Invariance 1(1): 9–18.Google Scholar
Deser, S. (1987), “Gravity from Self-Interaction in a Curved Background”, Gravity from Self-Interaction in a Curved Background 4:L99–L105.Google Scholar
Foerster, D., Nielsen, H., and Ninomiya, M. (1980), “Dynamical Stability of Local Gauge Symmetry”, Physics Letters 94B(2): 135–140.Google Scholar
Froggatt, C., and Nielsen, H. (1991), Origin of Symmetries. Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosso, P. (1999), “Symmetry Arguments in Physics”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30A(3): 479–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C. (2002), Gauging Gauge: Remarks on the Conceptual Foundations of Gauge Symmetry. Ph.D. dissertation Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Mills, R. (1989), “Gauge Fields”, Gauge Fields 57(6): 493–507.Google Scholar
Norton, J. (2000), “‘Nature is the Realisation of the Simplest Conceivable Mathematical Ideas’: Einstein and the Canon of Mathematical Simplicity”, ‘Nature is the Realisation of the Simplest Conceivable Mathematical Ideas’: Einstein and the Canon of Mathematical Simplicity 31(2): 135–170.Google Scholar
O’Raifeartaigh, L. (1979), “Hidden Gauge Symmetry”, Hidden Gauge Symmetry 42:159–223.Google Scholar
Ramond, P. (1990), Field Theory: A Modern Primer. Reading: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Redhead, M. (1975), “Symmetry in Intertheory Relations”, Symmetry in Intertheory Relations 32:77–112.Google Scholar
Ryder, L. H. (1996), Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘t Hooft, G. (1980), “Gauge Theories of the Forces between Elementary Particles”, Gauge Theories of the Forces between Elementary Particles 242:104–138.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, B. (1989), Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wald, R. (1986), “Spin-Two Fields and General Convariance”, Spin-Two Fields and General Convariance 33(12): 3613–3625.Google Scholar
Wald, R., and Lee, J. (1990), “Local Symmetries and Constraints”, Local Symmetries and Constraints 31(3): 725–743.Google Scholar
Weinberg, S. (1965), “Photons and Gravitons in Perturbation Theory: Derivation of Maxwell’s and Einstein’s Equations”, Photons and Gravitons in Perturbation Theory: Derivation of Maxwell’s and Einstein’s Equations 138(4B): 988–1002.Google Scholar
Weinberg, S. (1974a), “Gauge and Global Symmetries at High Temperature”, Gauge and Global Symmetries at High Temperature 9(12): 3357–3378.Google Scholar
Weinberg, S. (1974b), “Recent Progress in Gauge Theories of the Weak, Electromagnetic and Strong Interactions”, Recent Progress in Gauge Theories of the Weak, Electromagnetic and Strong Interactions 46(2).Google Scholar
Weinberg, S. (1995), The Quantum Theory of Fields: Volume I, Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, C., and Mills, R. (1954), “Isotopic Spin Conservation and a Generalized Gauge Invariance”, Isotopic Spin Conservation and a Generalized Gauge Invariance 96: 191.Google Scholar