Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-10T05:40:53.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inconsistent Theories as Scientific Objectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Dilip B. Madan*
Affiliation:
Department of Economic Statistics, University of Sydney

Abstract

Theories are conceptualized as predictors of phenomena using computable functions acting on prior world information. Formally, the concept of bounded prior world recursive function is defined and used as a candidate for a potential theory. An artificial world of fact is then constructed for which there exist two inconsistent best theories, in that they cannot be improved upon, and these theories are maximally inconsistent in that every best theory is a compromise. It is argued that in such a world the scientific objective would be to find these maximally inconsistent theories. The construction is motivated as an attempt to illustrate the status of theory in the social sciences and in economics, in particular.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author would like to acknowledge the assistance of a referee in observing and conjecturing a fundamental difference between bpw recursion theory and recursion theory as demonstrated in the appendix.

References

Feyerabend, P. K. (1962), “Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism” in Feigl, Herbert and Maxwell, Grover (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. III. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Lachlan, A. H. (1968), “On the Lattice of Recursively Enumerable Sets”, Transactions of the American Mathematics Society 130: 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, H. Jr. (1967), Theory of recursive functions and effective computability. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar