Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T02:50:58.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kitts and Kitts and Caplan on Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

David L. Hull
David L. Hull*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , March 1981 , pp. 141 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I wish to thank Arthur Caplan, Michael Ghiselin, David Kitts, Sr. and Alex Rosenberg for reading and commenting on early versions of this paper. The research for this paper was supported in part by NSF grant SOC 75-03535 and a Guggenheim Fellowship for 1980–81.

References

Caplan, A. (1979), “A critical examination of current sociobiological theory: adequacy and implications,” in Barlow, G. and Silberberg, J. (eds.), Sociobiology: Beyond Nature/Nurture, Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Caplan, A. (1980), “Have species become declassé?” Asquith, P. and Giere, R. (eds.), PSA 1980, vol. 1, East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Caplan, A. (1981), “Back to class: a note on the ontology of species,” Philosophy of Science 48: 130–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocchiarella, N. (1976), “On the logic of natural kinds,” Philosophy of Science 43: 202–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldredge, N., and Gould, S. (1972), “Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism,” in Schopf, T. J. M. (ed.), Models in Paleobiology, San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper & Co.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, M. T. (1966), “On psychologism in the logic of taxonomic principles,” Systematic Zoology 15: 207–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghiselin, M. T. (1969), The Triumph of the Darwinian Method, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, M. T. (1972), “Models in phylogeny,” in Schopf, T. J. M. (ed.), Models in Paleobiology, San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper and Co.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, M. T. (1974), “A radical solution to the species problem,” Systematic Zoology 23: 536–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1970), “Dolio on Dollo's law: irreversibility and the status of evolutionary laws,” Journal of the History of Biology 3: 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. L. (1976), “Are species really individuals?” Systematic Zoology 25: 174–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. L. (1978), “A matter of individuality,” Philosophy of Science 45: 335–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. L. (1979), “The limits of cladism,” Systematic Zoology 28: 417–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. L. (1980), “Individuality and Selection,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitts, D. B. (1977), “Karl Popper, verifiability, and systematic zoology,” Systematic Zoology 26: 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitts, D. B. (1978), “Theoretics and Systematics: A reply to Cracraft, Nelson, and Patterson,” Systematic Zoology 27: 222–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitts, D. B., and Kitts, D. J. (1979), “Biological species as natural kinds,” Philosophy of Science 46: 613–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S. (1972), “Naming and necessity,” in Davidson, D. and Harman, G. (eds.), Semantics and Natural Language, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1969), Principles of Systematic Zoology, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1975), “The unity of the genotype,” Biologisches Zentralblatt 94: 377–388.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1978), “Evolution,” Scientific American 239: 46–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Putnam, H. (1970), “Is semantics possible?” in Kiefer, H. E. and Munitz, M. K. (eds.), Language, Belief and Metaphysics, Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (1980), Sociobiology and the Preemption of Social Science, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. (1963), Philosophy and Scientific Realism, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. (1968), Between Science and Philosophy, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. and Sneath, P. H. A. (1961), Principles of Numerical Taxonomy, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. and Brown, W. L. (1953), “The subspecies concept,” Systematic Zoology 2: 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar