Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T17:56:35.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Meaningfulness of Questions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

T. A. Cowan
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
C. W. Churchman
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.

Extract

The history of Western culture exhibits a profound cleavage of opinion on the nature of what its members take to be reality. On the one hand, there are those for whom certain aspects, at least, of the “real” exist in the human mind only. Others assign as the sole basis of reality the world of non-mental objects. This difference of temperament is so pervasive that it forms a perennial theme, not only for philosophers, but also for scientists, poets, and other students of the vast panorama of the world and its people.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 “Critique of Naturalism,” Jour. Phil. XLII, 10 (1945), pp. 253–270.

2 “Are Naturalists Materialists?,” Jour. Phil. XLII, 19 (1945), pp. 515–530.

3 Mind as Behavior (1924); “On Spontaneity,” Jour. Phil. XXII, 16 (1925); “On the Conscious Mind,” Jour. Phil. XXVI, 21 (1929). “Beyond Mechanism and Vitalism,” Phil. of Science, I, 3 (1934); “Logico-Historical Study of Mechanism,” Studies in the History, U. of Pa. Bicentennial Conference, U. of Pa. Press (1941)