Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T15:53:43.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Need for a Scientific Ethic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Extract

The use that the scientist makes of his principles is well known. In the normal course of scientific investigation, a hypothesis which explains some physical phenomenon adequately in every particular, but which runs counter to, say, the laws of inertia, cannot be held without further experimentation. Such experimentation must continue until the irreconcilability of the hypothesis with the laws is resolved. In most cases the hypothesis will fail to submit to further tests, will be declared inadequate, and will give way to a new one.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This example has been used previously by the writer in “The Ethical Dilemma of Non-Naturalism”; The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. XLIII, March 14, 1946, pp. 161–163.