Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T21:22:11.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reconceiving Eliminative Inference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Patrick Forber
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Eliminative reasoning seems to play an important role in the sciences, but should it be part of our best theory of science? Statistical evidence, prevalent across the sciences, causes problems for eliminative inference, supporting the view that probabilistic theories of confirmation provide a better framework for reasoning about evidence. Here I argue that deductive elimination has an important inferential role to play in science, one that is compatible with probabilistic approaches to evidence. Eliminative inferences help frame testing problems, an essential step that determines the context for evaluating statistical evidence. I illustrate this process with examples from molecular evolutionary biology.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 78 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 185 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

Thanks to Peter Godfrey-Smith, Mark Richard, Elliott Sober, and Kyle Stanford for extensive comments on earlier drafts. Thanks also to audiences at the University of California, Irvine, Logic and Philosophy of Science Department and the Colorado State University Philosophy Department for useful feedback and to the anonymous referees for valuable criticism.

References

Abzhanov, Arhat, Kuo, Winston P., Hartmann, Christine, Grant, B. Rosemary, Grant, Peter R., and Tabin, Clifford J.. 2006. “The Calmodulin Pathway and Evolution of Elongated Beak Morphology in Darwin's Finches.” Nature 442:563–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abzhanov, Arhat, Protas, Meredith, Grant, B. Rosemary, Grant, Peter R., and Tabin, Clifford J.. 2004. “Bmp4 and Morphological Variation of Beaks in Darwin's Finches.” Science 305:1462–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, Doyle Sir Arthur. 1890. The Sign of Four. London: Blackett.Google Scholar
Dretske, Fred. 1981. “The Pragmatic Dimension of Knowledge.” Philosophical Studies 40:363–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earman, John. 1992. Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eyre-Walker, Adam. 2002. “Changing Effective Population Size and the MacDonald-Kreitman Test.” Genetics 162:2017–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyre-Walker, Adam. 2006. “The Genomic Rate of Adaptive Evolution.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21 (10): 569–75.Google ScholarPubMed
Felsenstein, Joseph. 1985. “Phylogenies and the Comparative Method.” American Naturalist 125:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forber, Patrick. 2008. “Forever beyond Our Grasp?” Biology and Philosophy 23:135–41.Google Scholar
Forber, Patrick. 2010. “Confirmation and Explaining How Possible.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41:32–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fry, Brian G. 2005. “From Genome to ‘Venome’: Molecular Origin and Evolution of the Snake Venom Proteome Inferred from Phylogenetic Analysis of Toxin Sequences and Related Body Proteins.” Genome Research 15:403–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fry, Brian G., Lumsden, Natalie G., Wüster, Wolfgang, Wickramaratna, Janith C., Hodgson, Wayne C., and Kini, R. Manjunatha. 2003. “Isolation of a Neurotoxin (α-Colubritoxin) from a Nonvenomous Colubrid: Evidence for Early Origin of Venom in Snakes.” Journal of Molecular Evolution 57:446–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fry, Brian G., Scheib, Holger, van der Weerd, Louise, Young, Bruce, McNaughtan, Judith, Ryan Ramjan, S. F., Vidal, Nicolas, Poelmann, Robert E., and Norman, Janette A.. 2008. “Evolution of an Arsenal.” Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 7 (2): 215–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fry, Brian G., and Wüster, Wolfgang. 2004. “Assembling an Arsenal: Origin and Evolution of the Snake Venom Proteome Inferred from Phylogenetic Analysis of Toxin Sequences.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 21 (5): 870–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fry, Brian G., Wüster, Wolfgang, Kini, R. Manjunatha, Brusic, V., Khan, A., Venkataraman, D., and Rooney, A. P.. 2003. “Molecular Evolution and Phylogeny of Elapid Snake Venom Three-Finger Toxins.” Journal of Molecular Evolution 57:110–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fry, Brian G., Wüster, Wolfgang, Ryan Ramjan, S. F., Jackson, Timothy, Martelli, Paolo, and Kini, R. Manjunatha. 2003. “Analysis of Colubroidea Snake Venoms by Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectrometry: Evolutionary and Toxinological Implications.” Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 17:2047–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fry, Brian G., et al. 2006. “Early Evolution of the Venom System in Lizards and Snakes.” Nature 439:584–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graur, Dan, and Li, Wen-Hsiung. 2000. Fundamentals of Molecular Evolution. 2nd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, James. 1993. “Bayesian Induction Is Eliminative Induction.” Philosophical Topics 21:99–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Leah, Goodman, Noah D., Tenenbaum, Joshua B., and Woodward, James. 2010. “The Structure and Dynamics of Scientific Theories: A Hierarchical Bayesian Perspective.” Philosophy of Science 77:172–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, James. 2007. “Bayes’ Theorem.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2007/entries/bayes-theorem/.Google Scholar
King, Jack L., and Jukes, Thomas H.. 1969. “Non-Darwinian Evolution.” Science 164:788–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitcher, Philip. 1993. The Advancement of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kornegay, Janet R., Schilling, James W., and Wilson, Allan C.. 1994. “Molecular Adaptation of a Leaf-Eating Bird: Stomach Lysozyme of the Hoatzin.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 11 (6): 921–28.Google ScholarPubMed
Kreitman, Martin. 1983. “Nucleotide Polymorphism at the Alcohol Dehydrogenase Locus of Drosophila melanogaster.” Nature 304:412–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreitman, Martin. 2000. “Methods to Detect Selection in Populations with Applications to Humans.” Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 1:539–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyburg, Henry. 1961. Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Maher, Patrick. 2004. “Probability Captures the Logic of Scientific Confirmation.” In Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science, ed. Hitchcock, Christopher, 69–93. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Margoliash, Emanuel, and Smith, Emil L.. 1965. “Structural and Functional Aspects of Cytochrome in Relation to Evolution.” In Evolving Genes and Proteins, ed. Bryson, V. and Vogel, H.. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, John H., and Kreitman, Martin. 1991. “Adaptive Protein Evolution at the Adh Locus in Drosophila.” Nature 351:652–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messier, Walter, and Stewart, Caro-Beth. 1997. “Episodic Adaptive Evolution of Primate Lysozymes.” Nature 385:151–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nei, Masatoshi, Gu, Xun, and Sitnikova, Tatyana. 1997. “Evolution by the Birth-and-Death Process in Multigene Families of the Vertebrate Immune System.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94 (15): 7799–7806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norton, John D. 1995. “Eliminative Induction as a Method of Discovery: How Einstein Discovered General Relativity.” In The Creation of Ideas in Physics, ed. Leplin, Jarrett, 29–69. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, John R. 1964. “Strong Inference.” Science 146:347–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sober, Elliott. 1990. “Contrastive Empiricism.” In Scientific Theories, Vol. 14, ed. W. Savage, 392–412. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 1993. “Epistemology for Empiricists.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 18:39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 1999. “Testability.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 73:47–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 2005. “Is Drift a Serious Alternative to Natural Selection as an Explanation of Complex Adaptive Traits?” In Philosophy, Biology and Life, ed. O’Hear, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 2008. Evidence and Evolution: The Logic behind the Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, Elliott, and Orzack, Stephen Hecht. 2003. “Common Ancestry and Natural Selection.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54:423–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, Roy. 2006. “Epistemic Paradoxes.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2006/entries/epistemic-paradoxes/.Google Scholar
Stanford, P. Kyle. 2006. Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Caro-Beth, Schilling, James W., and Wilson, Allan C.. 1987. “Adaptive Evolution in the Stomach Lysozymes of Foregut Fermenters.” Nature 330:401–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, Caro-Beth, and Wilson, Allan C.. 1987. “Sequence Convergence and Functional Adaptation of Stomach Lysozymes from Foregut Fermenters.” Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology 52:891–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vidal, Nicolas, and Hedges, S. Blair. 2002. “Higher-Level Relationships of Caenophidian Snakes Inferred from Four Nuclear and Mitochondrial Genes.” Comptes Rendus Biologies 325:987–95.Google ScholarPubMed
Vonk, Freek J., et al. 2008. “Evolutionary Origin and Development of Snake Fangs.” Nature 454:630–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed