No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Rejoinder to Utz
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 April 2022
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0031824800060645/resource/name/firstPage-S0031824800060645a.jpg)
- Type
- Discussion
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1977 by the Philosophy of Science Association
References
REFERENCES
Noble, D., “Charles Taylor on Teleological Explanation.” Analysis 27 (1967): 96–103.10.1093/analys/27.3.96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, D., “The Conceptualist View of Teleology.” Analysis 28 (1967): 62–63.10.1093/analys/28.2.62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C., “Teleological Explanation—A Reply to Denis Noble.” Analysis 27 (1967): 141–143.Google Scholar
Utz, S., “On Teleology and Organisms (Discussion).” Philosophy of Science 44 (1977): 313–320.10.1086/288748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, L., Teleological Explanations. Berkeley University of California Press, (1976).10.1525/9780520333697CrossRefGoogle Scholar