Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T12:20:27.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Rosenberg on Genic Selectionism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Elliott Sober  and
Richard C. Lewontin
Elliott Sober
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Wisconsin—Madison
Richard C. Lewontin
Affiliation:
Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Rosenberg (1983), in his comments on our article (Sober and Lewontin 1982) concerning the units of selection controversy, has matters precisely backwards. He chides us for conflating a causal theory with a mathematical model, whereas this is precisely the error we argued is at the core of the position defended by Williams (1966) and Dawkins (1976). Their idea—genic selectionism—confuses the computational adequacy of a mathematical model with a substantive causal theory. The main point of our paper was simply this: the fact that evolution by natural selection can be “represented” in terms of selection coefficients that attach to single genes does not imply that selection is always selection for or against the possession of those single genes.

Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , December 1983 , pp. 648 - 650
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dawkins, R. (1976), The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Doolittle, W. and Sapienza, C. (1980), “Selfish Genes, The Phenotype Paradigm, and Genome Evolution”, Nature 284: 601–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, R. and Dunn, L. (1960), “The Evolutionary Dynamics of a Polymorphism in the House Mouse”, Genetics 45: 705–722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orgel, L. and Crick, F. (1980), “Selfish DNA: The Ultimate Parasite”, Nature 284: 604–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, A. (1983), “Discussion: Coefficients, Effects, and Genic Selection”, Philosophy of Science 50: 332–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. and Lewontin, R. (1982), “Artifact, Cause, and Genic Selection”, Philosophy of Science 49: 147–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, M. (1978), “A Critical Review of the Models of Group Selection”, Quarterly Review of Biology 53: 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. (1966), Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar