Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T11:14:41.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sameness and Separability in Gauge Theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

John Dougherty
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the philosophical literature on Yang-Mills theories, field formulations are taken to have more structure and to be local, while curve-based formulations are taken to have less structure and to be nonlocal. I formalize the notion of locality at issue and show that theories with less structure are nonlocal. However, the amount of structure had by some formulation is independent of whether it uses fields or curves. The relevant difference in structure is not a difference in set-theoretic structure. Rather, it is a difference in the structure of the category of models of the theory.

Type
Physical Sciences
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 84 , Issue 5 , December 2017 , pp. 1189 - 1201
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

For helpful comments, discussion, and guidance, thanks are owed to Ben Feintzeig, Sarita Rosenstock, Sebastian Speitel, Anncy Thresher, Jim Weatherall, and the University of California, Irvine, philosophy of physics reading group. This work was performed under a collaborative agreement between the University of Illinois at Chicago and the University of Geneva and made possible by grant (10) 56314 from the John Templeton Foundation, and its contents are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of the John Templeton Foundation.

References

Aharonov, Y., and Bohm, D. 1959. “Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory.” Physical Review 115:485–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belot, G. 1998. “Understanding Electromagnetism.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (4): 531–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benini, M., Schenkel, A., and Szabo, R. 2015. “Homotopy Colimits and Global Observables in Abelian Gauge Theory.” Letters in Mathematical Physics 105 (9): 1193–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. 1987. “From Groups to Groupoids: A Brief Survey.” Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 19 (2): 113–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halvorson, H. 2012. “What Scientific Theories Could Not Be.” Philosophy of Science 79 (2): 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healey, R. 2007. Gauging What’s Real. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, S. 2008. “A Homotopy Theory for Stacks.” Israel Journal of Mathematics 163 (1): 93–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laumon, G., and Moret-Bailly, L. 2000. Champs algébriques. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyre, H. 2004. “Holism and Structuralism in U(1) Gauge Theory.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science B 35 (4): 643–70.Google Scholar
Mac Lane, S., and Moerdijk, I. 1992. Sheaves in Geometry and Logic. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Myrvold, W. C. 2011. “Nonseparability, Classical, and Quantum.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (2): 417–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redhead, M. 2001. “The Intelligibility of the Universe.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 48:73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstock, S., Barrett, T. W., and Weatherall, J. O. 2015. “On Einstein Algebras and Relativistic Spacetimes.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science B 52:309–16.Google Scholar
Rosenstock, S., and Weatherall, J. O. 2016. “A Categorical Equivalence between Generalized Holonomy Maps on a Connected Manifold and Principal Connections on Bundles over That Manifold.” Journal of Mathematical Physics 57 (10): 102902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiber, U. 2013. “Differential Cohomology in a Cohesive ∞-Topos.” Unpublished manuscript, arXiv.org, Cornell University. arXiv:1310.7930v1.Google Scholar
Wallace, D. 2014. “Deflating the Aharonov-Bohm Effect.” Unpublished manuscript, arXiv.org, Cornell University. arXiv:1407.5073.Google Scholar
Weatherall, J. O. 2016a. “Fiber Bundles, Yang-Mills Theory, and General Relativity.” Synthese 193 (8): 2389–2425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherall, J. O. 2016b. “Understanding Gauge.” Philosophy of Science 83 (5): 1039–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, T. T., and Yang, C. N. 1975. “Concept of Nonintegrable Phase Factors and Global Formulation of Gauge Fields.” Physical Review D 12:3845–57.Google Scholar