Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T17:21:21.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Qualms about Functionalist Marxism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Joel Dickman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defence (1978), G. A. Cohen has developed a distinctively functionalist interpretation of historical materialism. In this paper I outline Cohen's novel reconstruction of Marx and subject it to two independent internal criticisms. I first argue that explanations cannot conform to Cohen's functionalist model. I then suggest that even if there could be explanations having the structure he has proposed, they would fail to be helpful in illuminating the causal kernel of Marx's theory. Finally I sketch a neglected but more promising approach to clarifying historical materialism, due to Geoffrey Hellman.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 57 , Issue 4 , December 1990 , pp. 631 - 643
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I'm grateful to Daniel Brudney, Joshua Cohen, Geoffrey Hellman, Jack Knight, Andrew Levine, Ronald McClamrock, Elliott Sober and an anonymous Philosophy of Science referee for valuable remarks on various versions of this paper. And a belated but warm thanks to Alvin Goldman, Jaegwon Kim, Stephen Stich and Lawrence Sklar for being terrific teachers.

References

Cohen, G. A. (1978), Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defence. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (1982), “Functional Explanation, Consequence Explanation, and Marxism”, Inquiry 25: 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (1986), “Walt on Historical Materialism and Functional Explanation”, Ethics 97: 219–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1982), “Review of G. A. Cohen's Karl Marx' s Theory of History: A Defence”, The Journal of Philosophy 79: 253–273.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1980), “Actions, Reasons, and Causes”, in Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–19.Google Scholar
Engels, F. (1890), Letter to Joseph Bloch, Sept. 21, 1890, in Tucker, R. C. (ed.), The Marx-Engels Reader, 2nd edition (1978), New York: W. W. Norton, pp. 760–765.Google Scholar
Hellman, G. (1979), “Historical Materialism”, in D. Mepham and D.-H. Ruben (eds.), Issues in Marxist Philosophy, Vol. 2: Materialism. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, pp. 143–170.Google Scholar
Levine, A., and Wright, E. O. (1980), “Rationality and Class Struggle”, New Left Review 123: 47–68.Google Scholar
McMurtry, J. (1978), The Structure of Marx's World-View. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1847), The Poverty of Philosophy, in Collected Works. Moscow: Progress Publishers (1975): VI, p. 166.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1859), Preface to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, in Tucker, R. C. (ed.), The Marx-Engels Reader, 2nd edition (1978). New York: W. W. Norton, p. 4.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1867), Capital I. London (1970): V, p. 372 n.Google Scholar
Ruben, D.-H. (1980), “Cohen, Marx and the Primacy Thesis”, British Journal of Political Science 11: 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, W. H. (1978), Marx's Theory of History. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar