Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T03:47:17.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Value, Valuation, and Natural-Science Methodology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Clark L. Hull
Clark L. Hull*
Affiliation:
Institute of Human Relations Yale University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the initial obstacles to the study of the theory of value is the fact that practically every author whom the student consults on the subject characterizes value and valuation differently, and seems to trace them ultimately to a different source. For example, one writer will formulate a theory of value in terms of pain and pleasure (1); another, in terms of feeling (16, p.22); another, in terms of desires or wants (3, p.1); still others, in terms of “requiredness” (8, p.63), of interest (11, p.115), of striving (4, pp.1–29); and so on.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , July 1944 , pp. 125 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association 1944

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bentham, J. An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. British Moralists, edited by Selby-Bigge, L. A., Vol. I. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press, 1897.Google Scholar
2. Dewey, J. Theory of valuation. International encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. II. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1939.Google Scholar
3. Fairchild, F. R., Furniss, E. S., and Buck, N. S. Economics. New York: The Macmillan Co., 1937.Google Scholar
4. Hull, C. L. Psychology seminar memoranda, 1939–1940. Bound mimeographed material on file in the libraries of the University of Iowa, Oberlin College, and Yale University.Google Scholar
5. Hull, C. L. Principles of behavior. New York: D. Appleton-Century Co., 1943.Google Scholar
6. Hull, C. L. Elementary theory of individual behavior (in preparation).Google Scholar
7. Hull, C. L., Hovland, C. I., Ross, R. T., Hall, M., Perkins, D. T., and Fitch, F. B. Mathematico-deductive theory of rote learning. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1940.Google Scholar
8. Köhler, W. The place of value in a world of facts. New York: Liveright Publishing Corp., 1938.Google Scholar
9. Northrop, F. S. C. The impossibility of a theoretical science of economic dynamics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1941, Nov., 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Perin, C. T. Behavior potentiality as a joint function of the amount of training and the degree of hunger at the time of extinction. J. Exper. Psychol., 1942, 30, 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Perry, R. B. General theory of value. New York: Longmans, Green and Co., 1926.Google Scholar
12. Reid, J. R. A theory of value. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1938.Google Scholar
13. Robbins, L. The nature and significance of economic science, 2nd ed. London: Macmillan and Co., 1937.Google Scholar
14. Rueff, J. From the physical to the social sciences. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1929.Google Scholar
15. Spence, K. W. The differential response in animals to stimuli varying within a single dimension. Psychol. Rev., 1937, 44, 430–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Urban, W. M. Valuation: its nature and laws. London: George Allen and Unwin, Ltd., 1909.Google Scholar
17. Wolfe, J. B. Effectiveness of token-rewards for chimpanzees. Comp. Psychol. Monogr., 1936, 12, No. 5.Google Scholar