Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T06:16:00.955Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is There a Dutch Book Argument for Probability Kinematics?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Brad Armendt
Brad Armendt*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago Circle
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dutch Book arguments have been presented for static belief systems and for belief change by conditionalization. An argument is given here that a rule for belief change which under certain conditions violates probability kinematics will leave the agent open to a Dutch Book.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , December 1980 , pp. 583 - 588
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I am grateful to Brian Skyrms and Paul Teller for helpful suggestions and encouragement.

References

Jeffrey, R. (1965), The Logic of Decision. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Skyrms, B. (1979), Causal Necessity. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Skyrms, B. (forthcoming), “Higher Order Degrees of Belief.” In Prospects for Pragmatism—Essays in Honor of F. P. Ramsey, Mellor, D. H. (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Teller, P. (1973), “Conditionalization and Observation.” Synthese 26: 218–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar