Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-04T13:07:07.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Metamathematics and the Philosophy of Mind: A Rejoinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

J. R. Lucas*
Affiliation:
Merton College, Oxford University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © 1971 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Goodstein, R., “The Significance of Incompleteness Theorems,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 14, 1963, pp. 208220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Locke, John., Essay Concerning Human Understanding.Google Scholar
[3] Lucas, J. R., “Minds, Machines and Godei,” Philosophy, vol. XXXVI, 1961, pp. 112127; reprinted in The Modeling of Mind (eds., Kenneth N. Sayre and Frederick J. Crosson), Notre Dame, 1963, pp. 255-271; and in Minds and Machines (ed., Alan Ross Anderson), Englewood Cliffs, 1964, pp. 43-59.Google Scholar
[4] Lucas, J. R., “True,” Philosophy, vol. XLIV, 1969, pp. 175186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Lucas, J. R., The Freedom of the Will, Oxford, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Webb, J., “Metamathematics and the Philosophy of Mind,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 35, 1968, pp. 156178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar