Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T04:19:11.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Must Reasons be Rational?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Janet Levin
Janet Levin*
Affiliation:
School of Philosophy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper challenges some leading views about the conditions under which the ascription of beliefs and desires can make sense of, or provide reasons for, a creature's behavior. I argue that it is unnecessary for behavior to proceed from beliefs and desires according to the principles of logic and decision theory, or even from principles that generally get things right. I also deny that it is necessary for behavior to proceed from principles that, though perhaps subrational, are similar to those that we ourselves use. I then propose some conditions that are considerably weaker, and argue that they fulfill the descriptive and explanatory requirements of intentional ascription.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , June 1988 , pp. 199 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I am greatly indebted to Ed McCann, Brian Loar, and Hartry Field for many helpful conversations about these issues, and comments on various drafts of this paper. I am grateful to Jonathan Bennett for many valuable comments and suggestions as well. An early version of the paper was read at U.C. Irvine, in October, 1985. This work was partially supported by a grant from the USC Faculty Research and Innovation Fund.

References

REFERENCES

Bennett, J. (1976), Linguistic Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (1985), “Review of Davidson's Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation”, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation 94: 601–626.Google Scholar
Cherniak, C. (1981), “Minimal Rationality”, Mind 90: 161–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. (1973), “Radical Interpretation”, Dialecticos 27: 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. (1974), “Belief and the Basis of Meaning”, Synthese 27: 309–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. (1975), “Thought and Talk”, in Guttenplan, S. (ed.), Mind and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 7–23.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1971), “Intentional Systems”, Journal of Philosophy 68: 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. (1973), “Mechanism and Responsibility”, in Honderich, T., (ed.), T. Honderich, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 159–184.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1976), “Conditions of Personhood”, in Rorty, A. (ed.), The Identities of Persons. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, pp. 175–196.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1981a), “Three Kinds of Intentional Psychology”, in Healey, R. (ed.), Reduction, Time, and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 37–61.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1981b), “Making Sense of Ourselves”, Philosophical Topics 12: 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, H. (1971), “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person”, Journal of Philosophy 68: 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandy, R. (1973), “Reference, Meaning, and Belief”, Journal of Philosophy 70: 439–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahnemann, D., Slovic, P., Tversky, A. (eds.) (1982), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinn, C. (1977), “Charity, Interpretation, and Belief”, Journal of Philosophy 74: 521–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neely, W. (1974), “Freedom and Desire”, Philosophical Review 83: 32–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rock, I. and Harris, C. S. (1967), “Vision and Touch”, Scientific American 216: 96–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stich, S. (1981), “Dennett on Intentional Systems”, Philosophical Topics 12: 39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stich, S. (1982), “On the Ascription of Content”, in Woodfield, A. (ed.), Thought and Object. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 153–206.Google Scholar
Stich, S. (1983), From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stich, S. (1985), “Could Man Be an Irrational Animal?”, in Kornblith, H. (ed.), Naturalizing Epistemology. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, pp. 249–267.Google Scholar