Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T06:45:59.456Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Structural Approach to Defining Units of Selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Elisabeth A. Lloyd
Elisabeth A. Lloyd*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The conflation of two fundamentally distinct issues has generated serious confusion in the philosophical and biological literature concerning the units of selection. The question of how a unit of selection of defined, theoretically, is rarely distinguished from the question of how to determine the empirical accuracy of claims—either specific or general—concerning which unit(s) is undergoing selection processes. In this paper, I begin by refining a definition of the unit of selection, first presented in the philosophical literature by William Wimsatt, which is grounded in the structure of natural selection models. I then explore the implications of this structural definition for empirical evaluation of claims about units of selection. I consider criticisms of this view presented by Elliott Sober—criticisms taken by some (for example, Mayo and Gilinsky 1987) to provide definitive damage to the structuralist account. I shall show that Sober has misinterpreted the structuralist views; he knocks down a straw man in order to motivate his own causal account. Furthermore, I shall argue, Sober's causal account is dependent on the structuralist account that he rejects. I conclude by indicating how the refined structural definition can clarify which sorts of empirical evidence could be brought to bear on a controversial case involving units of selection.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , September 1989 , pp. 395 - 418
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I would like to thank Dick Lewontin for his helpful advice, criticism, and suggestions. For their valuable comments and criticism, I would also like to thank Bas van Fraassen, Evelyn Fox Keller, Bill Wimsatt, Steve Orzack, Dick Burian, Robert Brandon, Deborah Gordon, Hamish Spenser, David Hull, Sam Mitchell, Jim Griesemer, and James Woodward.

References

Alexander, R. D., and Borgia, G. (1978), “Group Selection, Altruism and the Levels of Organization of Life”, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 9: 449–474.10.1146/annurev.es.09.110178.002313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, A. J., and Fristrup, K. (1982), “The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection: A Hierarchical Expansion”, Paleobiology 8 (2): 113–129.10.1017/S0094837300004462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, A. J., and Wade, M. J. (1984), “On the Measurement of Natural and Sexual Selection: Theory”, Evolution 38: 709–719.10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00344.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beatty, J. (1980), “Optimal-Design Models and the Strategy of Model Building in Evolutionary Biology”, Philosophy of Science 47: 532–561.10.1086/288955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, J. (1981), “What's Wrong with the Received View of Evolutionary Theory?” PSA 1980, vol. 2. East Lansing, Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 397–426.Google Scholar
Beatty, J. (1982), “The Insights and Oversights of Molecular Genetics: The Place of the Evolutionary Perspective”, PSA 1982, vol. 1. East Lansing, Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 341–355.Google Scholar
Brandon, R. N. (1982), “The Levels of Selection”, PSA 1982, vol. 1. East Lansing, Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 315–323.Google Scholar
Brandon, R. N. (1986), “Review of The Nature of Selection”, The Philosophical Review 95: 614–617.Google Scholar
Brandon, R. N., and Burian, R. M. (eds.) (1984), Genes, Organisms, Populations: Controversies over the Units of Selection. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Buss, L. W. (1983), “Evolution, Development, and the Units of Selection”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 80: 1387–1391.10.1073/pnas.80.5.1387CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crow, J. F., and Aoki, K. (1982), “Group Selection for a Polygenic Behavioral Trait: A Differential Proliferation Model”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 79: 2628–2631.10.1073/pnas.79.8.2628CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damuth, J., and Heisler, I. L. (1988), “Alternative Formulations of Multilevel Selections”, Biology and Philosophy (Oct.): 407–430.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976), The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1982), The Extended Phenotype. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Fenner, F. (1965), “Myxoma Virus and Oryctolagus cuniculus”, in H. G. Baker and G. L. Stebbins (eds.), The Genetics of Colonizing Species. New York: Academic Press, pp. 485–501.Google Scholar
Futuyma, D. J. (1979), Evolutionary Biology. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Gilpin, M. E. (1975), Group Selection in Predator-Prey Communities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691209463CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griesemer, J. R., and Wade, M. J. (1988), “Laboratory Models, Causal Explanation, and Group Selection”, Biology and Philosophy (Jan.): 67–96.Google Scholar
Hull, D. L. (1980), “Individuality and Selection”, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 311–332.10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.001523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, P. W. (1985), “Quantitative Probabilistic Causality and Structural Scientific Realism”, PSA 1984 vol. 2. East Lansing, Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 329–342.Google Scholar
Kempthorne, O. (1957), An Introduction to Genetic Statistics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Levin, S. and Pimentel, D. (1981), “Selection of Intermediate Rates of Increase in Parasite-Host Systems”, American Naturalist 117: 308–315.10.1086/283708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1970), “The Units of Selection”, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 1–18.10.1146/annurev.es.01.110170.000245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1974), “The Analysis of Variance and the Analysis of Cause”, American Journal of Human Genetics 26: 400–411.Google Scholar
Li, C. C. (1964), Introduction to Experimental Statistics. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. A. (1984), “A Semantic Approach to the Structure of Population Genetics”, Philosophy of Science 51: 242–264.10.1086/289179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, E. A. (1986), “Thinking about Models in Evolutionary Theory”, Philosophica 37: 87–100.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. A. (1987), “The Confirmation of Ecological and Evolutionary Models”, Biology and Philosophy 2: 277–293.10.1007/BF00128834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, E. A. (1988), The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. (1976), “Group Selection”, Quarterly Review of Biology 51: 277–283.Google Scholar
Mayo, D., and Gilinsky, N. (1987), “Models of Group Selection”, Philosophy of Science 54: 515–538.10.1086/289403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCauley, D. E., and Wade, M. J. (1980), “Group Selection: The Genetic and Demographic Basis for the Phenotypic Differentiation of Small Populations of Tribolium castaneum”, Evolution 34: 813–821.10.1111/j.1558-5646.1980.tb04020.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosteller, F., and Tukey, J. W. (1977), Data Analysis and Regression. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Nunney, L. (1985), “Group Selection, Altruism, and Structured-Deme Models”, American Naturalist 126: 212–230.10.1086/284410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roughgarden, J. (1979), Theory of Population Genetics and Evolutionary Ecology: An Introduction. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. (1980), “Charles Darwin and Group Selection”, Annals of Science 37: 615–630.10.1080/00033798000200421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1981), “Holism, Individualism, and the Units of Selection”, PSA 1980, vol. 2. East Lansing, Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1984), The Nature of Selection. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E., and Lewontin, R. C. (1982), “Artifact, Cause, and Genic Selection”, Philosophy of Science 49: 157–180.10.1086/289047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R., and Torrie, J. (1960), Principles and Procedures of Statistics: With Special Reference to the Biological Sciences. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Thompson, P. (1983), “The Structure of Evolutionary Theory: A Semantic Perspective”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 14: 215–229.10.1016/0039-3681(83)90013-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P. (1985) “Sociobiological Explanation and the Testability of Sociobiological Theory”, in J. H. Fetzer (ed.), Sociobiology and Epistemology. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 201–215.10.1007/978-94-009-5370-3_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P. (1986) “The Interaction of Theories and the Semantical Conception of Evolutionary Theory”, Philosophica 37: 28–37.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, B. C. (1980), The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0198244274.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrba, E. S., and Gould, S. J. (1986), “The Hierarchical Expansion of Sorting and Selection: Sorting and Selection Cannot Be Equated”, Paleobiology 12 (2): 217–228.10.1017/S0094837300013671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, M. J. (1978), “A Critical Review of the Models of Group Selection”, Quarterly Review of Biology 53: 101–114.10.1086/410450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, M. J. (1985), “Soft Selection, Hard Selection, Kin Selection and Group Selection”, American Naturalist 125: 61–73.10.1086/284328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, M. J., and McCauley, D. E. (1980), “Group Selection: The Phenotypic and Genotypic Differentiation of Small Populations”, Evolution 34: 799–812.10.1111/j.1558-5646.1980.tb04019.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, G. C. (1966), Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. (1983), “The Group Selection Controversy: History and Current Status”, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 14: 159–187.10.1146/annurev.es.14.110183.001111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimsatt, W. (1980), “Reductionist Research Strategies and Their Biases in the Units of Selection Controversy”, in T. Nickles (ed.), Scientific Discovery: Case Studies. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 213–259.10.1007/978-94-009-9015-9_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimsatt, W. (1981) “Units of Selection and the Structure of the Multi-Level Genome”, PSA 1980, vol. 2. East Lansing, Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar