Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T15:00:32.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Urning a Resolution of Hempel's Paradox

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Stuart L. Meyer*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ayer, A. J. Probability and Evidence. New York: Columbia University Press, 1972.10.1007/978-1-349-01907-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brillouin, L. Science and Information Theory. (2nd edition.). New York: Academic Press, 1962.10.1063/1.3057866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. Logical Foundation of Probability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Gardner, M.On the Fabric of Inductive Logic.” Scientific American 234 (1976): 119ff.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. Fact Fiction and Forecast. (2nd edition.). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G.Studies in the Logic of Confirmation.” Mind 54 (1945): 126, 97–121.10.1093/mind/LIV.213.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, S. L. Data Analysis for Scientists and Engineers. New York: Wiley, 1975.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper and Row, 1959.Google Scholar
Quine, W. v. O. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, 1970.Google Scholar