No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Analogy Reviewed
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 February 2009
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0031819100019379/resource/name/firstPage-S0031819100019379a.jpg)
- Type
- Discussion
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1976
References
1 Palmer, Humphrey, Analogy (Macmillan, London, 1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Burrell, David, Analogy and Philosophical Language (Yale University Press, New Haven London, 1973)Google Scholar.
2 La doctrine de I'analogie de l'être d'après Saint Thomas d'Aquin (Louvain, 1963), p. 47Google Scholar.
3 Fr Bochenski has drawn attention to the fact that the term ‘systematic ambiguity’, coined by Russell and Whitehead, is an exact translation of the mediaeval aequivocatio a consilio: see ‘On Analogy’, in Menne, A. (ed.), Logico- Philosophical Studies (Dordrecht, 1962), p. 104CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 ‘An Irrelevance of Omnipotence’, Philosophy, 48 (186), Oct. 1973, 333Google Scholar.