Article contents
Paradoxes and Infinite Numbers
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 January 2009
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0031819100041887/resource/name/firstPage-S0031819100041887a.jpg)
- Type
- Discussion
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1993
References
1 ‘Wholes, Parts and Infinite Collections’, Philosophy 67, No. 261, 367–79.Google Scholar
2 The Principles of Mathematics, 2nd edition (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1937), 357–60.Google Scholar
3 If we refuse to talk of passing through points at all, we merely sidestep the paradox, which Zeno probably saw in terms of intervals.
4 Op. cit. Appendix B
5 C f., e.g., Ginsburg, H., Children's Arithmetic (Austin Texas: Proed, 1977), Chapter 1.Google Scholar
6 Apart from the initial element, which has only a successor.
- 1
- Cited by