Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T05:26:45.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simultaneity: A Composite Rejoinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Michael Cohen
Michael Cohen
Affiliation:
University of Wales, Swansea
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

V. Alan White and Gertrud Walton have published responses to my note on Einstein's simultaneity Gedankenexperiment, in which I present a version of the argument free of the flaws to be found in that given by Einstein. White thinks I go too far, that no reformulation is necessary; Walton, that I don't go far enough, and that i the inconsistencies in Einstein's exposition are ‘irreconcilable’. I r shall try to explain why I think both are mistaken.

Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 70 , Issue 274 , October 1995 , pp. 587 - 589
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ‘Relativity and Simultaneity Redux’, Philosophy, 68, 1993, 401–4;Google Scholar see alsoWhite's ‘Cohen on Einstein's Simultaneity Gedankenexperiment’, Philosophy, 66, 1991, 245.Google Scholar

2 ‘Cohen on Einstein on Simultaneity’, Philosophy, 70, 1995, 114–8.Google Scholar

3 ‘Simultaneity and Einstein's Gedankenexperiment’, Philosophy, 64, 1989, 391–6; see also myGoogle Scholar‘Einstein on Simultaneity’, Philosophy, 67, 1992, 543–8.Google Scholar