Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T20:17:59.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Berkeley and the Tree in the Quad

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

E. J. Furlong
E. J. Furlong
Affiliation:
University of Dublin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 41 , Issue 156 , April 1966 , pp. 169 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 170 note 1 The references are to DrLuce, 's diplomatic edition, Berkeley's philosophical commentaries (1944)Google Scholar. I shall refer to it as P.C. I am obliged to Dr Luce and to Dr G. E. Davie for comments on a draft of this paper.

page 171 note 1 See P.C., pp. xxvGoogle Scholarf. and Luce, A. A., The dialectic of immaterialism, p. 24Google Scholar. Chapter IX of the latter book deals fully with intermittency in the note-books.

page 173 note 1 Sillem, E. A., chap. 6 in George Berkeley and the proofs for the existence of God (Longmans, 1957)Google Scholar, goes so far as to treat the two arguments as if they were in fact one. (He notes also the argument in Alciphron IVGoogle Scholar, a blend of Berkeley's earlier thinking (in part) and the usual argument from, or to, design.)