Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T14:49:42.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Causation: Rejoinder to Sanford

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Ted Honderich
Affiliation:
University College London

Extract

The door's being shut caused the room to be wanner. As we can also say, a set of conditions or events which included the door's being shut caused the room to be warmer. The set of conditions or events. whatever is to be said more carefully of their ontological category, and their closer specification, can be called a causal chrwnslance. The question of causal priority, as it is named, is the question of analysing or elucidating the difference or asymmetry between cause and causal circumstance on the one hand, and, on the other hand, their effect. David Sanford does not like my answer1 and sticks to his own more original one2. I should like to say briefly why

Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Causes and If p, even if x, still q. Philosophy 57, No. 221 (July 1982), 314.Google Scholar

2 ‘Causal Multiplicity and Causal Dependence’. Philosophy 60, No. 232 (April 1985), 215.