Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T13:33:44.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Changing the Subject

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Oswald Hanfling
Affiliation:
The Open University

Extract

The question I set myself in ‘Loving my neighbour, loving myself’ was whether the injunction to love one's neighbour as oneself makes sense. I said explicitly (156) that I was concerned with ‘love’ in the modern English sense and not with ancient words whose meaning might differ from that of the modern word. Nevertheless two critics think my argument fails because I do not consider other meanings of ‘love’ that have been or might be invoked in understanding the injunction. According to them, the injunction is not, or was not, meant in the ordinary modern sense of ‘love’, and they quote various authorities to this effect.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Philosophy, April 1993Google Scholar

2 G. Walton ‘Hanfling on Loving my Neighbour’, Loving Myself, Philosophy, October 1994and D. M. Radcliffe ‘Hanfling on Neighbour Love’, loc. cit.Google Scholar

3 ‘Scepticism′s Health Buoyant’, Philosophy, October 1994.Google Scholar

4 T. S. Champlin, ‘Hanfling on Self-Love’, Philosophy, January 1995Google Scholar