No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A Reply to Antony Flew
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 January 2009
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0031819100046647/resource/name/firstPage-S0031819100046647a.jpg)
- Type
- Discussion
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1994
References
1 Philosophy, 67, 261 (July 1992), 394–398. Further references are included in the text.Google Scholar
2 Philosophy, 66, 257 (July 1991), 339–347. Further references are included in the text.Google Scholar
3 For a presentation of the view that there is no such thing as personal identity see my ‘The No-self Theory: Hume, Buddhism, and Personal Identity’, Philosophy East and West, 43, 2 (April 1993), 175–200.Google Scholar