12th August 2024: digital purchasing is currently unavailable on Cambridge Core. Due to recent technical disruption affecting our publishing operation, we are experiencing some delays to publication. We are working hard to restore services as soon as possible and apologise for the inconvenience. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 January 2009
In ‘Scientific Research and Moral Rectitude’ Robert Hoffman defends the scientific community against critics who maintain that ‘the researcher's claim to freedom of inquiry should be upheld only if his discovery does not adversely affect mankind….’ He uses two arguments in his defence, both of which purport to show that this sort of criticism is logically misconceived.
1 Philosophy 50 (1975), 475–477.Google Scholar
2 Ibid., 475.
3 International Herald-Tribune, 10 02 1976.Google Scholar
4 Op. cit., 476.Google Scholar
5 Ibid.
6 We should note that Hoffman's view of the moral (non-)responsibility of scientists has the further absurd consequence that it is au fond ‘senseless’ to praise scientists for discoveries which have beneficial effects. If we ought not to blame a scientist for his government's use of his discoveries in waging chemical warfare, then on what grounds ought we to praise a scientist for discovering a cure for cancer, say? (Assuming that the scientist does not himself go about administering the cure to various patients.)
7 I wish to thank A. P. Valiunas for his criticisms of my style.
