Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:35:28.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Review article

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2015

Giorgio Magri
Giorgio Magri*
Affiliation:
CNRS, Université Paris 8 and University of Utrecht
*
*E-mail: magrigrg@gmail.com.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In his recent bid for the presidency of the Association for Mathematics of Language, Makoto Kanazawa writes:*

The scientific study of language is such a large and important field that it's strange that so little mathematical research is being carried out. By comparison, the latest issue of Journal of Economic Theory has 14 original articles, and all but one of them are mathematical papers in the sense of containing theorems and proofs. And the title of the journal is not ‘Journal of Mathematical Economics’, which is actually a separate journal.1

That linguistics lags behind economics is not surprising: making more money is a stronger drive for change and progress than better understanding the language faculty. But Bruce Tesar's book shows that the time might be ripe for change and progress in our field as well. Employing a formally sophisticated analytical approach (as opposed to a purely simulation-based approach), the book provides a beautiful example of the interplay between learnability and structural assumptions on the typological space. It thus shows that computational phonology has become a mature subfield of generative linguistics.

Type
Review Article
Information
Phonology , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , December 2014 , pp. 525 - 556
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alderete, John, Brasoveanu, Adrian, Prince, Nazarré Merchant, Alan & Tesar, Bruce (2005). Contrast analysis aids the learning of phonological underlying forms. WCCFL 24. 34–42.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (2004). Phonological acquisition in Optimality Theory: the early stages. In Kager et al. (2004). 158–203.Google Scholar
Kager, René (1999). Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kager, René, Pater, Joe & Zonneveld, Wim (eds.) (2004). Constraints in phonological acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Merchant, Nazarré (2008). Discovering underlying forms: contrast pairs and ranking. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Merchant, Nazarré & Tesar, Bruce (2008). Learning underlying forms by searching restricted lexical subspaces. CLS 41:2. 33–47.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan (2002). Entailed ranking arguments. Ms, Rutgers University. Available as ROA-500 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Tesar, Bruce (2004). Learning phonotactic distributions. In Kager et al. (2004). 245–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesar, Bruce (2006). Faithful contrastive features in learning. Cognitive Science 30. 863–903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tesar, Bruce, Alderete, John, Horwood, Graham, Nishitani, Nazarré Merchant, Koichi & Prince, Alan (2003). Surgery in language learning. WCCFL 22. 477–490.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Magri supplementary material

Appendix

Download Magri supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1.9 MB