Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-03T07:45:26.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Syllable structure and phonetic models*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2008

Ian Maddieson  and
Kristin Precoda
Ian Maddieson
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Kristin Precoda
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Through construction of predictive models, phoneticians are making increasingly sophisticated attempts to account for certain aspects of the phonological structure of languages from very general principles(Stevens 1989; Lindblom 1984; Ohala 1990, 1992).

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , May 1992 , pp. 45 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cherry, Colin (1957). On human communication. Cambridge, Mass.: Technology Press of MIT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1985). The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2. 225–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1992). On feature asynchrony: comments on the paper by Ohala. In Docherty & Ladd (1992). 183–189.Google Scholar
Crothers, John (1978). Typology and universals of vowel systems. In Greenberg, J. H. (ed.) Universals of human language. Vol. 2: Phonology. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 93–152.Google Scholar
Docherty, G. J. & Ladd, D. R. (eds.) (1992). Papers in laboratory phonology II: gesture, segment, prosody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Allen L. (1960). Experimental design in psychological research. Revised edn. New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar
Everett, Daniel (1982). Phonetic rarities in Pirahã. JIPA 12. 94–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, Daniel (1986). Pirahã. In Derbyshire, D. & Pullum, G. (eds.) Handbook of Amazonian languages. Berlin: Mouton. 200–326.Google Scholar
Faust, Norma W. (1973). Lecciones para el aprendisaje del idioma Shipibo-Conibo. Lima: Instituto de Verano.Google Scholar
Firchow, Irwin & Firchow, Jacqueline (1969). An abbreviated phoneme inventory. Anthropological Linguistics 11. 271–276.Google Scholar
Firchow, I., Firchow, J. & Akoitai, D. (1973). Vocabulary of Rotokas-Pidgin-English. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics, Papua New Guinea Branch.Google Scholar
Hurlbut, Hope M. (1988). Verb morphology in Eastern Kadazan. Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Janson, Tore (1986). Cross-linguistic trends in CV sequences. Phonology Yearbook 3. 179–196.Google Scholar
Kawasaki, Haruko (1982). An acoustical basis for universal constraints on sound sequences. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Klockars, Alan J. & Sax, Gilbert (1986). Multiple comparisons. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter (1982). A course in phonetics. 2nd edn.New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn (1984). Can the models of evolutionary biology be applied to phonetic problems? In van den Broeke, M. P. R. & Cohen, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Dordrecht: Foris. 67–81.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn (1986). Phonetic universal in vowel systems. In Ohala, J. J. & Jaeger, J. J. (eds.) Experimental phonology. Orlando, Fl.: Academic Press. 13–44.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn (1990). Models of phonetic variation and selection. PERILUS (Phonetic Experimental Research, Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm) 11. 65–100. To appear in L. Cavalli-Sforza & A. Piazza (eds.) Language change and biological evolution. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McClelland, J. L. & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 18. 1–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maddieson, Ian (1984). Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, William (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition 25. 71–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marslen-Wilson, William (1989). Access and integration: projecting sound onto meaning. In Marslen-Wilson, W. (ed.) Lexical representation and process. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1980). Chairman's introduction to the symposium on phonetic universals in phonological systems and their explanation. In Fischer-Jørgensen, E. & Thorsen, N. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Vol. 3. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen. 181–185.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1990). There is no interface between phonology and phonetics: a personal view. JPh 18. 153–171.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1992). The segment: primitive or derived? In Docherty & Ladd (1992). 166–183.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. & Kawasaki, Haruko (1984). Prosodic phonology and phonetics. Phonology Yearbook 1. 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pukui, Mary K. & Elbert, Samuel H. (1986). Hawaiian dictionary. Revised and expanded edn. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütz, Albert J. (1981). A reanalysis of the Hawaiian vowel system. Oceanic Linguistics 20. 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, Claude E. & Weaver, Warren (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, K. N. (1972). The quantal nature of speech: evidence from articulatory-acoustic data. In David, E. E. & Denes, P. B. (eds.) Human communication: a unified view. London: Academic Press. 51–66.Google Scholar
Stevens, K. N. (1989). On the quantal nature of speech. JPh 17. 3–45.Google Scholar