Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T18:38:17.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sabrina Bendjaballah, Ali Tifrit and Laurence Voeltzel (eds.) (2021). Perspectives on Element Theory (Studies in Generative Grammar 143). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Pp. v + 280

Review products

Sabrina Bendjaballah, Ali Tifrit and Laurence Voeltzel (eds.) (2021). Perspectives on Element Theory (Studies in Generative Grammar 143). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Pp. v + 280

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2022

Edoardo Cavirani*
Affiliation:
Center for Research in Syntax, Semantics, and Phonology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; E-mail: edoardo.cavirani@kuleuven.be.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, John (1987). The tradition of structural analogy. In Steele, R. & Threadgold, T. (eds.) Language topics: essays in honour of Michael Halliday. John Benjamins, 3343.Google Scholar
Anderson, John & Ewen, Colin (1987). Principles of dependency phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John & Jones, Charles (1974). Three theses concerning phonological representations. Journal of Linguistics 10. 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avery, Peter & Idsardi, William J. (2001). Laryngeal dimensions, completion and enhancement. In Hall, Tracy Alan (ed.) Distinctive Feature Theory. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 4170.Google Scholar
Backley, Phillip (2011). An introduction to Element Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavirani, Edoardo & van Oostendorp, Marc (2020). A theory of the theory of vowels. Berlin and Boston: Mouton de Gruyter, 3756.Google Scholar
Cyran, Eugeniusz (2011). Laryngeal realism and laryngeal relativism: two voicing systems in Polish? Studies in Polish Linguistics 6. 4580.Google Scholar
Hulst, Harry van der (1993). Units in the analysis of signs. Phonology 10. 209241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulst, Harry van der (2020). Principles of Radical CV Phonology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, Sean (1994). Is ʔ an element? Towards a non-segmental phonology. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 4. 7178.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan, Lowenstamm, Jean & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger (1985). The internal structure of phonological representations. Phonology Yearbook 2. 305328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean (1996). CV as the only syllable type. In Durand, Jacques & Laks, Bernard (eds.) Current trends in phonology: models and methods, volume 2. Salford, Manchester: ESRI, 419441.Google Scholar
Nasukawa, Kuniya (ed.) (2020). Morpheme-internal recursion in phonology. Berlin and Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pöchtrager, Markus (2006). The structure of length. PhD dissertation, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Pöchtrager, Markus & Kaye, Jonathan (2013). GP 2.0. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 16. 5164.Google Scholar
Samuels, Bridget (2011). Phonological architecture: a biolinguistic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schane, Sandford (1984). The fundamentals of particle phonology. Phonology 1. 129155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheer, Tobias (2004). A lateral theory of phonology, volume 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar