Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T07:18:38.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of growth habit on grain yield and its component traits in horse gram [Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2023

Basalapura Rangegowda Chandana*
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Sampangi Ramesh
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Rotti Kirankumar
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Gonal Basanagouda
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Gowdru Veerabhadrappa Ranjitha
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Banakara Santhoshkumari
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
*
Corresponding author: Basalapura Rangegowda Chandana; Email: chandanargowda6@gmail.com

Abstract

In common with other grain legumes, the growth habit in horse gram is one of the domestication-driven adaptive traits. Horse gram exhibits determinate and indeterminate types of growth habits. Determinate genotypes have non-overlapping vegetative and reproductive phases combined with a compact growth habit which enables farmers to produce horse gram in intercropping and multiple cropping systems, a common practice for sustainable agriculture production. Also, synchronous flowering, and pod development and maturity of determinate genotypes enable mechanical harvesting. Empirical studies have indicated a greater grain yield potential of indeterminate compared to determinate genotypes. However, we hypothesize that indeterminate and determinate genotypes do not differ for their grain yield potential if they are in isogenic genetic backgrounds. To test this hypothesis, we compared eight pairs of near isogenic (NI) indeterminate and determinate genotypes for their grain yield potential during two rainy seasons in one location and one rainy season in another location. The eight pairs of NI determinate and indeterminate genotypes differed significantly in each of the three test environments. Indeterminate genotypes produced a greater pod (harvestable) and grain (marketable) yields than their determinate counterparts only in a few genetic backgrounds. These results thus support our hypothesis that determinate genotypes are comparable to indeterminate ones, if not better than the latter.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of National Institute of Agricultural Botany

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashwini, KVR, Ramesh, S and Sunitha, NC (2021) Comparative BLUP, YREM-based performance and AMMI model-based stability of horse gram [Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.] genotypes differing in growth habit. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 68, 457467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandana, BR, Ramesh, S, Basanagouda, G and Kirankumar, R (2021) Genetics of growth habit in horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 68, 27432748. doi: 10.1007/s10722-021-01221-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrakant, , Uday Kumar, HR, Ramesh, S, Keerthi, CM, Mohan Rao, A, Byregowda, M and Suresh, (2018) Comparative seed yield stability of determinate and indeterminate RILs of dolichosbean (Lablab purpureus L. Sweet) var. lignosus. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7, 32693295.Google Scholar
Huyghe, C (1998) Genetics and genetic modifications of plant architecture in grain legumes: a review. Agronomie 18, 383411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, S, Fujii, K, Yumoto, S, Tshimoto, M, Shiraiwa, T, Sayama, T, Kikuchhi, A and Nishio, T (2015) Seed yield and its components of indeterminate and determinate lines in recombinant inbreed lines of soybean. Breeding Science 65, 154160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, S, Sayama, T, Ishimoto, M, Yumoto, S, Kikuchi, A and Nishio, T (2018) Effect of stem growth habit on single seed weight and seed uniformity in soy bean (Glycine max (L.) Merill.). Breeding Science 68, 352359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keerthi, CM, Ramesh, S, Byregowda, M, Mohan Rao, A, Mary Reena, GA and Chandrakant, N (2014) Performance stability of photoperiod sensitive vs. insensitive dolichos bean (Lablab purpureus L. var. Lignosus) cultivars under delayed sowing conditions. Australian Journal of Crop Science 8, 16581662.Google Scholar
Nadal, SA, Cabello, F, Flores, and Moreno, MJ (2005) Effect of growth habit on agronomic characters in faba bean. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus 70, 4347.Google Scholar
Uday Kumar, HR, Byre Gowda, M and Ramesh, S (2017) Does relative performance of determinate and indeterminate dolichos bean (Lablab purpureus L. Sweet) recombinant inbred lines (RILs) depend on maturity duration? International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 6, 527540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Chandana et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 20.2 KB