Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:04:57.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pigeonpea composite collection and identification of germplasm for use in crop improvement programmes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2011

H. D. Upadhyaya ,
K. N. Reddy ,
Shivali Sharma ,
R. K. Varshney ,
R. Bhattacharjee ,
Sube Singh  and
C. L. L. Gowda
H. D. Upadhyaya*
Affiliation:
Gene Bank, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, Hyderabad, PO 502324, Andhra Pradesh, India
K. N. Reddy
Affiliation:
Gene Bank, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, Hyderabad, PO 502324, Andhra Pradesh, India
Shivali Sharma
Affiliation:
Gene Bank, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, Hyderabad, PO 502324, Andhra Pradesh, India
R. K. Varshney
Affiliation:
Gene Bank, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, Hyderabad, PO 502324, Andhra Pradesh, India
R. Bhattacharjee
Affiliation:
Gene Bank, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, Hyderabad, PO 502324, Andhra Pradesh, India
Sube Singh
Affiliation:
Gene Bank, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, Hyderabad, PO 502324, Andhra Pradesh, India
C. L. L. Gowda
Affiliation:
Gene Bank, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, Hyderabad, PO 502324, Andhra Pradesh, India
*
*Corresponding author. h.upadhyaya@cgiar.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. is one of the most important legume crops as major source for proteins, minerals and vitamins, in addition to its multiple uses as food, feed, fuel, soil enricher, or soil binder, and in fencing, roofing and basket making. ICRISAT's genebank conserves 13,632 accessions of pigeonpea. The extensive use of few parents in crop improvement is contrary to the purpose of collecting a large number of germplasm accessions and has resulted in a narrow base of cultivars. ICRISAT, in collaboration with the Generation Challenge Program, has developed a composite collection of pigeonpea consisting of 1000 accessions representing the diversity of the entire germplasm collection. This included 146 accessions of mini core collection and other materials. Genotyping of the composite collection using 20 microsatellite or simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers separated wild and cultivated types in two broad groups. A reference set comprising 300 most diverse accessions has been selected based on SSR genotyping data. Phenotyping of the composite collection for 16 quantitative and 16 qualitative traits resulted in the identification of promising diverse accessions for the four important agronomic traits: early flowering (96 accessions), high number of pods (28), high 100-seed weight (88) and high seed yield/plant (49). These accessions hold potential for their utilization in pigeonpea breeding programmes to develop improved cultivars with a broad genetic base. Pigeonpea germplasm has provided sources of resistance to abiotic and biotic stresses and cytoplasmic-male sterility for utilization in breeding programmes.

Keywords

characterizationcomposite setcytoplasmic-male sterilitydiversitymini core collectionpigeonpeareference set
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , April 2011 , pp. 97 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ariyanayagam, RP, Rao, AN and Zaveri, PP (1995) Cytoplasmic-genic male-sterility in interspecific matings of Cajanus. Crop Science 35: 981–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bantilan, MCS and Joshi, PK (1996) Adoption and impact of pigeonpea ICP 8863. In: Baidu-Forson, J, Bantilan, MCS, Debrah, SK and Rohrback, DD (eds) Partners in Impact Assessment. Summary Proceedings of an ICRISAT/NARS Workshop on Methods and Joint Impact Targets in Western and Central Africa, 3–5 May 1995, Sadore, Niger. Patancheru, AP: ICRISAT, pp. 36–39.Google Scholar
Brown, AHD (1989) Core collections: a practical approach to genetic resources management. Genome 31: 818–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, MJ, Edwards, KJ, Newbury, HJ, Ford-Lloyd, BV and Baggott, CD (2001) Development of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers for the assessment of gene flow and genetic diversity in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan). Molecular Ecology Notes 1: 283–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, BD and Clarkson, JM (1994) A simple procedure for optimizing the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using modified Taguchi methods. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 3801–3805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalvi, VA, Saxena, KB, Luo, RH and Li, YR (2010) An overview of male-sterility systems in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Euphytica 173: 397–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duvick, DN (1995) Security and long-term prospects for conservation of genetic resources. Research in Domestic and International Agribusiness Management 11: 33–45.Google Scholar
Ferreira, ME (2005) Molecular analysis of genebanks for sustainable conservation and increased use of plant genetic resources. Paper presented in International Workshop on The Role of Biotechnology for the Characterization and Conservation of Crop, Forestry, Animal and Fishery Genetic Resources 5–7 March 2005, Turin, Italy, pp. 78–82.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization(2008) http://www/FAO.ORG/FAOSTAT/database.Google Scholar
Frankel, OH (1984) Genetic perspective of germplasm conservation. In: Arber, W, Limensee, K, Peacock, WJ and Stralinger, P (eds) Genetic Manipulations: Impact on Man and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 161–170.Google Scholar
Glaszmann, JC, Kilian, B, Upadhyaya, HD and Varshney, RK (2010) Accessing genetic diversity for crop improvement. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 13: 167–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gower, JC (1971) A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27: 857–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckenberger, M, Bohn, M, Ziegle, JS, Joe, LK, Hauser, JD, Hutton, M and Melchinger, AE (2002) Variation of DNA fingerprints among accessions within maize inbred lines and implications for identification of essentially derived varieties. I. Genetic and technical sources of variation in SSR data. Molecular Breeding 10: 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IBPGR and ICRISAT(1993) Descriptors for Pigeonpea. Patancheru/AP: IBPGR/ICRISAT.Google Scholar
Idury, RM and Cardon, LR (1997) A simple method for automated allele binning in microsatellite markers. Genome Research 7: 1104–1109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, S, Gupta, S, Chandra, S and Singh, BB (2004) How wide is genetic base of pulse crops? In: Ali, M, Singh, BB, Kumar, Shiv and Vishwa, Dhar (eds) Pulses in New Perspective. Proceedings of the National Symposium on Crop Diversification and Natural Resources Management, 20–22 December 2003. Kanpur: Indian Society of Pulses Research and Development, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, pp. 211–221.Google Scholar
Kumar, PL, Latha, TK, Kulkarni, NK, Raghavendra, K, Saxena, KB, Waliyar, F, Rangaswamy, KT, Muniyappa, V, Doriswamy, S and Jones, AT (2005) Broad-based resistance to pigeonpea sterility mosaic disease in wild relatives of pigeonpea (Cajanus: Phaseoleae). Annals of Applied Biology 146: 371–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, K and Muse, SV (2005) Power marker: integrated analysis environment for genetic marker data. Bioinformatics 21: 2128–2129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mace, ES, Buhariwalla, HK and Crouch, JH (2003) A high-throughput DNA extraction protocol for tropical molecular breeding programs. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 21: 459a–459h.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallikarjuna, N and Saxena, KB (2002) Production of hybrids between Cajanus acutifolius and C. cajan. Euphytica 124: 107–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallikarjuna, N and Saxena, KB (2005) A new cytoplasmic nuclear male sterility derived from cultivated pigeonpea. Euphytica 142: 143–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, DR (1989) Limitations to the use of germplasm collections. In: Brown, AHD, Frankel, OH, Marshall, DR and Williams, JT (eds) The Use of Plant Genetic Resources. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 105–120.Google Scholar
Nene, YL and Sheila, VK (1990) Pigeonpea: geography and importance. In: Nene, YL, Hall, SD and Sheila, VK (eds) The Pigeonpea. Wallingford, Oxon: CAB International, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Odeny, DA, Jayashree, B, Ferguson, M, Hoisington, D, Crouch, J and Gebhardt, C (2007) Development, characterization and utilization of microsatellite markers in pigeonpea. Plant Breeding 126: 130–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odeny, DA, Jayashree, B, Gebhardt, C and Crouch, J (2009) New microsatellite markers for pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.). BMC Research Notes 2: 35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrier, X, Flori, A and Bonnot, F (2003) Data analysis methods. In: Hamon, P, Seguin, M, Perrier, X and Glazmann, JC (eds) Genetic Diversity of Cultivated Tropical Plants. Montpellier: Enfield, Science Publishers, pp. 43–76.Google Scholar
Reddy, LJ and Faris, DJ (1981) A cytoplasmic-genetic male sterile line in pigeonpea. International Pigeonpea Newsletter 1: 16–17.Google Scholar
Reddy, LJ, Saxena, KB, Jain, KC, Singh, U, Green, JM, Sharma, D and Faris, DJ (1997) Registration of high protein elite germplasm ICPL 87162. Crop Science 37: 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxena, KB and Kumar, RV (2003) Development of a cytoplasmic nuclear male-sterility system in pigeonpea using C. scarabaeoides (L.) Thouars. Indian Journal of Genetics 63: 225–229.Google Scholar
Saxena, KB, Singh, L and Gupta, MD (1990) Variation for natural out-crossing in pigeonpea. Euphytica 46: 143–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxena, KB, Kumar, RV, Srivastava, N and Shiying, B (2005) A cytoplasmic–nuclear male-sterility system derived from a cross between Cajanus cajanifolius and C. cajan. Euphytica 145: 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxena, KB, Kumar, RV, Madhavi Latha, K and Dalvi, VA (2006) Commercial pigeonpea hybrids are just a few steps away. Indian Journal of Pulses Research 19: 7–16.Google Scholar
Shannon, CE and Weaver, W (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Subbarao, GV, Johansen, C, Jana, MK and Kumar Rao, JVDK (1991) Comparative salinity responses among pigeonpea genotypes and their wild relatives. Crop Science 31: 415–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, G (1986) Introduction to Quality Engineering, Asian Productivity Organization. Dearborn, Michigan: American Supplier Institute Inc..Google Scholar
Tikka, SBS, Parmer, LD and Chauhan, RM (1997) First record of cytoplasmic genetic male sterility in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) through wide hybridization. Gujarat Agricultural University Research Journal 22: 60–162.Google Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD and Gowda, CLL (2009) Managing and Enhancing the Use of Germplasm – Strategies and Methodologies. Technical Manual no. 10. Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, p. 236.Google Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD and Ortiz, R (2001) A mini core collection for capturing diversity and promoting utilization of chickpea genetic resources in crop improvement. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 102: 1292–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD, Ortiz, R, Bramel, PJ and Sube, Singh (2003) Development of a groundnut core collection using taxanomical, geographical and morphological descriptors. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 50: 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD, Pundir, RPS, Gowda, CLL, Reddy, KN and Sube, Singh (2005) Geographical pattern of diversity for qualitative and quantitative traits in the pigeonpea germplasm collection. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization 3: 332–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD, Gowda, CLL, Buhariwalla, HK and Crouch, JH (2006a) Efficient use of crop germplasm resources: identifying useful germplasm for crop improvement through core and min-core collections and molecular marker approaches. Plant Genetic Resources 4: 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD, Reddy, LJ, Gowda, CLL, Reddy, KN and Chandra, S (2006b) Development of a mini core subset for enhanced and diversified utilization of pigeonpea germplasm resources. Crop Science 46: 2127–2132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD, Bhattacharjee, R, Varshney, RK, Hoisington, DA, Reddy, KN and Singh, S (2008) Assessment of genetic diversity in pigeonpea using SSR markers. In: 2008 Joint Annual Meeting, 5–9 October 2008, Houston, Texas.Google Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD, Yadav Devvart, , Dronavalli Naresh, , Gowda, CLL and Singh Sube, (2010) Mini core germplasm collections for infusing genetic diversity in plant breeding programs. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 1: 1294–1309.Google Scholar
van der Maesen, LJG (2006) Cajanus cajan (L.) Mill sp. In: Brink, M and Belay, G (eds) Plant Resources of Africa 1. Cereals and Pulses. Wageningen: Backhuys Publishers. http://database.prota.org/search.htm.Google Scholar