Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T22:15:25.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of yield-based selection indices for drought tolerance involving recombinant inbred line population derived from a chickpea cultivar (C. arietinum L.) and its wild relative (C. reticulatum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2024

Ashutosh Kushwah
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
Inderjit Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
Gurprit Singh
Affiliation:
Regional Research Station, Punjab Agricultural University, Faridkot, Punjab, India
Shayla Bindra
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
Suruchi Vij
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
Norah Johal
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
Kuldeep Kaur
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
Dharminder Bhatia
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
Sarvjeet Singh*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
*
Corresponding author: Sarvjeet Singh; Email: sarvjeetm@rediffmail.com

Abstract

Drought is a major abiotic stress worldwide limiting chickpea yield drastically. Low heritability and high genotype × environment interactions make the trait-based breeding strategy an unreliable approach. This study was planned to identify the drought-tolerant lines by evaluating yield-based selection indices in a recombinant inbred line (RIL) population derived from an inter-specific cross between drought-tolerant genotype GPF 2 (Cicer arietinum L.) and drought-sensitive accession ILWC 292 (C. reticulatum) at two locations in India (Ludhiana and Faridkot). A total of six yield-based selection indices were calculated and significant variation was observed in the RILs and their parents for yield-based selection indices at both locations. A holistic approach across association analysis and principal component analysis identified drought tolerance index, mean productivity, geometric mean productivity and harmonic mean productivity as key selection indices, which could be used for indirect selection of drought-tolerant lines. Overall, on the basis of these approaches, a total of 15 promising RILs were identified for their use in chickpea breeding programme for developing drought-tolerant cultivars.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of National Institute of Agricultural Botany

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anwar, J, Subhani, GM, Hussain, M, Ahmad, J, Hussain, M and Munir, M (2011) Drought tolerance indices and their correlation with yield in exotic wheat genotypes. Pakistan Journal of Botany 43, 15271530.Google Scholar
Baheri, SF, Javanshir, A, Kazemi, HA and Aharizad, S (2003) Evaluation of different drought tolerance indices in some spring barley genotypes. The Journal of Agricultural Sciences 13, 95100.Google Scholar
Drikvand, R, Doosty, B and Hosseinpour, T (2012) Response of rainfed wheat genotypes to drought stress using drought tolerance indices. The Journal of Agricultural Sciences 4, 126.Google Scholar
Fernandez, GCJ (1992) Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In Proc of the International Symp on Adaptation of Vegetable and Other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress. Taiwan: pp. 257–70.Google Scholar
Fisher, RA and Maurer, R (1978) Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29, 897912.Google Scholar
Gaur, R, Azam, S, Jeena, G, Khan, AW, Choudhary, S, Jain, M, Yadav, G, Tyagi, AK, Chattopadhyay, D and Bhatia, S (2012) High-throughput SNP discovery and genotyping for constructing a saturated linkage map of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). DNA Research 19, 357373.Google Scholar
Hamwieh, A, Imtiaz, M, Hobson, K and Ahmed, SK (2013) Genetic diversity of microsatellite alleles located at quantitative resistance loci for ascochyta blight resistance in a global collection of chickpea germplasm. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 52, 183191.Google Scholar
Jha, UC, Basu, P, Shil, S and Singh, NP (2016) Evaluation of drought tolerance selection indices in chickpea genotypes. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management 7, 12441248.Google Scholar
Jha, UC, Jha, R, Singh, NP, Shil, S and Kole, PC (2018) Heat tolerance indices and their role in selection of heat stress tolerant chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88, 260270.Google Scholar
Jukanti, AK, Gaur, PM, Gowda, CLL and Chibbar, RN (2012) Chickpea: nutritional properties and its benefits. British Journal of Nutrition 108, 1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kashiwagi, J, Krishnamurthy, L, Upadhyaya, HD and Gaur, PM (2008) Rapid screening technique for canopy temperature status and its relevance to drought tolerance improvement in chickpea. SAT eJournal 6, 14.Google Scholar
Khan, I and Dhurve, OP (2016) Drought response indices for identification of drought tolerant genotypes in rainfed upland (Oryza sativa L.). International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology 5, 7383.Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, L, Kashiwagi, J, Gaur, PM, Upadhyaya, HD and Vadez, V (2010) Sources of tolerance to terminal drought in the chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.) minicore germplasm. Field Crops Research 119, 322330.Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, L, Kashiwagi, J, Upadhyaya, HD, Gowda, CLL, Gaur, PM, Singh, S, Purushothaman, R and Varshney, RK (2013) Partitioning coefficient – a trait that contributes to drought tolerance in chickpea. Field Crops Research 149, 354365.Google Scholar
Kumar, J and Abbo, S (2001) Genetics of flowering time in chickpea and its bearing on productivity in semi arid environments. Advances in Agronomy 72, 107138.Google Scholar
Kumar, T, Bharadwaj, C, Rizvi, AH, Sarker, A, Tripathi, S, Alam, A and Chauhan, SK (2015) Chickpea landraces: a valuable and divergent source for drought tolerance. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture 33, 633638.Google Scholar
Kushwah, A, Gupta, S, Bindra, S, Johal, N, Singh, I, Bharadwaj, C, Dixit, GP, Gaur, PM, Nayyar, H and Singh, S (2020a) Gene pyramiding and multiple character breeding. In Singh, M (ed.), Chickpea: Crop Wild Relatives for Enhancing Genetic Gains. Netherlands: Elsevier Academic Press, pp. 131165.Google Scholar
Kushwah, A, Bindra, S, Singh, I, Dixit, GP, Sharma, P, Srinivasan, S, Gaur, PM and Singh, S (2020b) Advances in chickpea breeding and genomics for varietal development and trait improvement in India. In Gosal, SS and Wani, SH (eds), Accelerated Plant Breeding. Switzerland: Springer, pp. 3166.Google Scholar
Kushwah, A, Bhatia, D, Rani, U, Yadav, IS, Singh, I, Bharadwaj, C and Singh, S (2021a) Molecular mapping of quantitative trait loci for ascochyta blight and botrytis grey mould resistance in an inter-specific cross in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) using genotyping by sequencing. Breeding Science 71, 229239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kushwah, A, Bhatia, D, Singh, G, Singh, I, Bindra, S, Vij, S and Singh, S (2021b) Phenotypic evaluation of genetic variability and selection of yield contributing traits in chickpea recombinant inbred line population under high temperature stress. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 27, 747767.Google Scholar
Kushwah, A, Bhatia, D, Singh, I, Thudi, M, Singh, G, Bindra, S, Vij, S, Gill, BS, Bharadwaj, C, Singh, S and Varshney, RK (2021c) Identification of stable heat tolerance QTLs using inter-specific recombinant inbred line population derived from GPF 2 and ILWC 292. PLoS ONE 16, e0254957.Google Scholar
Kushwah, A, Bhatia, D, Barmukh, R, Singh, I, Singh, G, Bindra, S, Vij, S, Chellapilla, B, Pratap, A, Roorkiwal, M, Kumar, S, Varshney, RK and Singh, S (2022a) Genetic mapping of QTLs for drought tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Frontiers in Genetics 13, 953898.Google Scholar
Kushwah, A, Bhatia, D, Singh, G, Singh, I, Vij, S, Bindra, S, Siddique, KHM, Nayyar, H and Singh, S (2022b) Phenotypic evaluation of agronomic and root related traits for drought tolerance in recombinant inbred line population derived from a chickpea cultivar (C. arietinum L.) and its wild relative (C. reticulatum). Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 28, 14371452.Google Scholar
Ladizinsky, G (1975) A new Cicer from Turkey. Notes Roy Bot Gard, Edinburgh 34, 201202.Google Scholar
Ludlow, MM and Muchow, RC (1990) A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water limited environments. Advances in Agronomy 43, 107153.Google Scholar
Mahdy, RE, Althagafi, ZMA, Al-Zahrani, RM, Aloufi, HHK, Alsalmi, RA, Abeed, AHA, Mahdy, EE and Tammam, SA (2022) Comparison of desired-genetic-gain selection indices in late generations as an insight on superior-family formation in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Agronomy 12, 1738.Google Scholar
Millan, T, Clarke, HJ, Siddique, KHM, Buhariwalla, HK, Gaur, PM, Kumar, J, Gil, J, Kahl, G and Winter, P (2006) Chickpea molecular breeding: new tools and concepts. Euphytica 147, 81103.Google Scholar
Pang, J, Turner, NC, Khan, T, Du, YL, Xiong, JL, Colmer, TD and Siddique, KH (2017) Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to terminal drought: leaf stomatal conductance, pod abscisic acid concentration, and seed set. Journal of Experimental Botany 68, 19731985.Google Scholar
Parihar, AK, Godawat, SL, Singh, D, Parihar, CM and Jat, ML (2012) Behaviour of quality protein maize (QPM) genotypes under well irrigated and water stress conditions in subtropical climate. Maydica 57, 293299.Google Scholar
Porch, TG (2006) Application of stress indices for heat tolerance screening of common bean. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 192, 390394.Google Scholar
Purushothaman, R, Krishnamurthy, L, Upadhyaya, HD, Vadez, V and Varshney, R (2017) Genotypic variation in soil water use and root distribution and their implications for drought tolerance in chickpea. Functional Plant Biology 44, 235252.Google Scholar
Rosielle, AA and Hamblin, J (1981) Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and nonstress environments. Crop Science 21, 943946.Google Scholar
Sabaghnia, N and Janmohammadi, M (2014) Interrelationships among some morphological traits of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars using biplot. Botanica Lithuanica 20, 1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabaghpour, SH, Mahmoudi, AA, Saeed, A, Kamel, M and Malhotra, RS (2006) Study of chickpea drought tolerance lines under dryland conditions of Iran. Indian Journal of Crop Science 1, 7073.Google Scholar
Sabouri, A, Dadras, AR, Azari, M, Kouchesfahani, AS, Taslimi, M and Jalalifar, R (2022) Screening of rice drought-tolerant lines by introducing a new composite selection index and competitive with multivariate methods. Scientific Reports 12, 2163.Google Scholar
Sachdeva, S, Bharadwaj, C, Sharma, V, Patil, BS, Soren, KR, Roorkiwal, M, Varshney, R and Bhat, KV (2018) Molecular and phenotypic diversity among chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.) genotypes as a function of drought tolerance. Crop and Pasture Science 69, 142153.Google Scholar
Sallam, A, Alqudah, AM, Dawood, MF, Baenziger, PS and Börner, A (2019) Drought stress tolerance in wheat and barley: advances in physiology, breeding and genetics research. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, 3137.Google Scholar
Singh, RK and Chaudhary, BD (1985) Analysis in Biometrical Genetics. New Delhi, India: Kalyani Publishers.Google Scholar
Singh, G, Singh, MK, Tyagi, BS, Singh, JB and Kumar, P (2017) Germplasm characterization and selection indices in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) for waterlogged soils in India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 87, 11391148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thudi, M, Upadhyaya, HD, Rathore, A, Gaur, PM, Krishnamurthy, L, Roorkiwal, M, Nayak, SN, Chaturvedi, SK, Basu, PS, Gangarao, NV, Fikre, A, Kimurto, P, Sharma, PC, Sheshashayee, MC, Tobita, S, Kashiwagi, J, Ito, O, Killian, A and Varshney, RK (2014) Genetic dissection of drought and heat tolerance in chickpea through genome-wide and candidate gene-based association mapping approaches. PLoS ONE 9, e96758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toker, C, Lluch, C, Tejera, NA, Serraj, R and Siddique, KHM (2007) Abiotic stresses. In Yadav, SS, Redden, R, Chen, W and Sharma, B (eds), Chickpea Breeding and Management. United Kingdom: CAB International, pp. 474496.Google Scholar
Tuberosa, R and Salvi, S (2006) Genomics-based approaches to improve drought tolerance of crops. Trends in Plant Science 11, 405412.Google Scholar
Varshney, RK, Thudi, M, May, GD and Jackson, SA (2010) Legume genomics and breeding. In Janick, J (ed.), Plant Breeding Reviews. United Sates: Wiley, pp. 257304.Google Scholar
Varshney, RK, Mohan, SM, Gaur, PM, Gangarao, NVPR, Pandey, MK, Bohra, A, Sawargaonkar, SL, Chitikineni, A, Kimurto, PK, Janila, P, Saxena, KB, Fikre, A, Sharma, M, Rathore, A, Pratap, A, Tripathi, S, Datta, S, Chaturvedi, SK, Mallikarjuna, N, Anuradha, G, Babbar, A, Choudhray, AK, Mhase, MB, Bhardwaj, CH, Mannur, DM, Harer, PN, Guo, B, Liang, X, Nadrajan, N and Gowda, CLL (2013) Achievements and prospects of genomics-assisted breeding in three legume crops of the semi-arid tropics. Biotechnology Advances 10, 10161022.Google Scholar
Yang, X, Wang, B, Chen, L, Li, P and Cao, C (2019) The different influences of drought stress at the flowering stage on rice physiological traits, grain yield, and quality. Scientific Reports 9, 112.Google Scholar
Yucel, D and Mart, D (2014) Drought tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 1, 12991303.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kushwah et al. supplementary material

Kushwah et al. supplementary material
Download Kushwah et al. supplementary material(File)
File 90.7 KB