Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T04:37:15.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trichome and biochemical basis of resistance against Tuta absoluta in tomato genotypes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2019

Vaddi Sridhar*
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology and Nematology, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research (ICAR-IIHR), Bengaluru, Karnataka 560089, India
Avverahally Thammanna Sadashiva
Affiliation:
Division of Vegetable Sciences, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research (ICAR-IIHR), Bengaluru, Karnataka 560089, India
Vala Keshava Rao
Affiliation:
Division of Physiology and Biochemistry, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research (ICAR-IIHR), Bengaluru, Karnataka 560089, India
Padavala Swathi
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology and Nematology, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research (ICAR-IIHR), Bengaluru, Karnataka 560089, India
Hanamant Shivalingappa Gadad
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology and Nematology, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research (ICAR-IIHR), Bengaluru, Karnataka 560089, India
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: vaddi_sridhar@rediffmail.com

Abstract

South American tomato moth, Tuta absoluta, a serious pest of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) in tropics and subtropics, is rapidly spreading world over. Twenty one wild/cultivated/advanced breeding lines of tomato were screened for resistance to T. absoluta under greenhouse conditions (choice bioassay) and promising genotypes were evaluated further for their antibiosis activity through no choice bioassay under in-vitro conditions. From 21 genotypes screened, six wild accessions viz., S. pennellii (LA 1940); S. chilense (LA 1963); S. arcanum (LA 2157); S. lycopersicum (LA1257) and S. corneliomulleri (LA 1292, LA1274) were relatively resistant to T. absoluta based on mean percent damage and were further studied under in-vitro conditions. These genotypes recorded relatively more larval mortality, prolonged larval and pupal duration with reduced adult emergence of T. absoluta. Among these six genotypes, S. pennellii (LA-1940) showed resistance both under choice and no choice bioassays with higher number of type IV trichomes, highest total flavonoids and phenols. In general, glandular trichomes (GTs) (type I, IV, VII) showed negative correlation in different genotypes of tomato with reference to larval number/plant, percent damage and adult activity, whereas type V (non-GTs) showed negative correlation with number of larvae/plant.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azevedo, SM, Faria, MV, Maluf, WR, Oliveira, ACB and Freitas, JA (2003) Zingiberene-mediated resistance to the South American tomato pinworm derived from Lycopersicon hirsutum var. hirsutum. Euphytica 134: 347351.Google Scholar
Bao, J, Cai, Y, Sun, M, Wang, G and Corke, H (2005) Anthocyanins, flavonols, and free radical scavenging activity of Chinese bayberry (Myrica rubra) extracts and their color properties and stability. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53: 23272332.Google Scholar
Bitew, MK (2018) Significant role of wild genotypes of tomato trichomes for Tuta absoluta resistance. Journal of Plant Genetics and Breeding 2: 104.Google Scholar
Desneux, N, Wajnberg, E, Kris, AGW, Burgio, G, Arpaia, S, Narváez-Vasquez, CA, González-Cabrera, J, Catalán Ruescas, D, Tabone, E, Frandon, J, Pizzol, J, Poncet, C, Cabello, T and Urbaneja, A (2010) Biological invasion of European tomato crops by Tuta absoluta: ecology, geographic expansion and prospects for biological control. Journal of Pest Science 83: 197215.Google Scholar
Kang, JH, Shi, F, Jones, AD, Marks, MD and Howe, GA (2010) Distortion of trichome morphology by the hairless mutation of tomato affects leaf surface chemistry. Journal of Experimental Botany 61: 10531064.Google Scholar
Luckwill, LC (1943) The Genus Lycopersicon: An Historical, Biological and Taxonomic Survey of the Wild and Cultivated Tomatoes. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 44p.Google Scholar
Maluf, WR, Barbosa, LV and Santa, CLCS (1997) 2-Tridecanone-mediated mechanisms of resistance to the South American tomato pinworm Scrobipalpuloides absoluta (Meyrick, 1917) (Lepidoptera-Gelechiidae) in Lycopersicon spp. Euphytica 93: 189194.Google Scholar
McDowell, ET, Kapteyn, J, Schmidt, A, Li, C, Kang, JH, Descour, A and Gang, DR (2011) Comparative functional genomic analysis of Solanum glandular trichome types. Plant Physiology 155: 524539.Google Scholar
Oliveira, AF, de Silva, HJD, Leite, DLG, Jham, NG and Picanco, M (2009) Resistance of 57 greenhouse-grown accessions of Lycopersicon esculentum and three captives to Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Scientia Horticulturae 119: 182187.Google Scholar
Rakha, M, Zekeya, N, Sevgan, S, Musembi, M, Ramasamy, S and Hanson, P (2017) Screening recently identified whitefly/spider mite-resistant wild tomato accessions for resistance to Tuta absoluta. Plant Breeding 136: 562568.Google Scholar
Schilmiller, A, Shi, F, Kim, J, Charbonnaeu, LA, Holmes, D, Jones, DA and Last, LR (2010) The Plant Journal 62: 391403.Google Scholar
Singleton, VL and Rossi, JA (1965) Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic phosphotungstic acid reagents. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 16: 144158.Google Scholar
Sridhar, V, Chakravarthy, AK, Asokan, R, Vinesh, LS, Rebijith, KB and Vennila, S (2014) New record of the invasive South American tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in India. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems 20: 148154.Google Scholar
Tissier, A (2012) Glandular trichomes: what comes after expressed sequence tags? The Plant Journal 70: 5168.Google Scholar
Wilkens, RT, Shea, GO, Halbreich, S and Stamp, NE (1996) Resource availability and the trichome defences of tomato plants. Oecologia 106: 181191.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Sridhar et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S2 and Figures S1-S2

Download Sridhar et al. supplementary material(File)
File 610.9 KB