Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-22T06:47:59.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adapting to the Image and Resisting It: On Filming Literature and a Possible World for Literary Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Ian Balfour
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Predicting any future—or futures—for literary criticism is a risky business, perhaps all the more so now that the relation of literature to its others is arguably subject to greater and faster changes than ever before. The changes to come in literary criticism will be determined by transformations in literature proper as well as by any number of forces outside literature. By changes “within” literature we cannot mean simply those to contemporary or recent literature, whose canons—to say nothing of what exceeds these canons—are far from settled. The literary past continues to change even if every given text endlessly repeats itself like a broken record. For an authoritative formulation of this position, one need not turn to some outré poststructuralist or to Walter Benjamin's contention that even the dead are not “safe” from the reaches of the present (“On the Concept” 391). One can appeal to the sober, usually conservative thinking of T. S. Eliot:

The existing monuments form an ideal order among themselves, which is modified by the introduction of the new (the really new) work of art among them. The existing order is complete before the new work arrives; for order to persist after the supervention of novelty, the whole existing order must be, if ever so slightly, altered; and so the relations, proportions, values of each work of art toward the whole are readjusted; and this is conformity between the old and the new. Whoever has approved this idea of order, of the form of European, of English literature, will not find it preposterous that the past should be altered by the present as much as the present is directed by the past. (38)

Type
New Archives, New Aesthetics: Talks from the Convention
Information
PMLA , Volume 125 , Issue 4: Special Topic Literary Criticism for the Twenty-First Century , October 2010 , pp. 968 - 976
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Woody, Allen. “The Kugelmass Episode.” Side Effects. New York: Random, 1980. 59–78. Print.Google Scholar
Dudley, Andrew. Concepts in Film Theory. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1984. Print.Google Scholar
Jane, Austen. Emma. Ed. Parrish, Stephen M. New York: Norton, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Battestin, Martin A. “Adapting Fielding for Film and Television.” Eighteenth-Century Fiction on Screen. Ed. Mayer, Robert. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002. 88–105. Print.Google Scholar
Mark, Bauerlein. The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future (or, Don't Trust Anyone under 30). New York: Tarcher, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Bazin, André. What Is Cinema? Trans. Timothy Barnard. Montreal: Caboose, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Walter, Benjamin. “The Concept of Criticism in German Romanticism.” Trans. David Lachterman, Howard Eiland, and Ian Balfour. Benjamin, Walter Benjamin 1:116–200.Google Scholar
Walter, Benjamin. “On the Concept of History.” Trans. Harry Zohn. Benjamin, Walter Benjamin 4:386–400.Google Scholar
Walter, Benjamin. “The Task of the Translator.” Trans. Harry Zohn. Benjamin, Walter Benjamin 1:253–63.Google Scholar
Walter, Benjamin. Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings. Ed. Bullock, Marcus and Jennings, Michael W. 4 vols. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1996–2006. Print.Google Scholar
Boyle, Danny, dir. Trainspotting. Channel Four, 1996. Film.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan D. “Omniscience.” Narrative 12.1 (2004): 22–34. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliot, T. S. “Tradition and the Individual Talent.” Selected Prose of T. S. Eliot. Ed. Kermode, Frank. New York: Harcourt, 1975. 37–44. Print.Google Scholar
Kamilla, Elliott. “Novels, Films, and the Word/Image Wars.” A Companion to Literature and Film. Ed. Stam, Robert. Malden: Blackwell, 2008. 1–22. Print.Google Scholar
Hawks, Howard, dir. His Girl Friday. Columbia, 1940. Film.Google Scholar
Heckerling, Amy, dir. Clueless. Paramount, 1995. Film.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. Hegel's Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art. Trans. T. M. Knox. Vol. 11. Oxford: Clarendon, 1974. Print.Google Scholar
Fredric, Jameson. Signatures of the Visible. New York: Routledge, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Stephen, King. On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft. New York: Pocket, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Stephen, King. The Shining. New York: Pocket, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Kubrick, Stanley, dir. The Shining. Warner Brothers, 1980. Film.Google Scholar
Stanley, Kubrick. “Words and Movies.” Sight and Sound 30 (1960–61): 14. The Kubrick Site. Web. 18 June 2010.Google Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. Laocoön: An Essay on the Limits of Painting and Poetry. Ed. and trans. McCormick, Edward Allen. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1984. Print.Google Scholar
Jay, Leyda. Kino: A History of Russian and Soviet Film. 3rd ed. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1983. Print.Google Scholar
Romi, Mikulinsky. “Photography and Trauma in Photo-Fiction: Literary Montage in the Writings of Jonathan Safran Foer, Aleksandar Hemon and W. G. Sebald.” Diss. U of Toronto, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Miller, D. A. Jane Austen; or, The Secret of Style. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Nabokov, Vladimir. Lolita: A Screenplay. New York: Vintage, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
Nancy, Jean-Luc. The Ground of the Image. Trans. Jeff Fort. New York: Fordham UP, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. The Future of the Image. Trans. Gregory Elliott. London: Verso, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Salman, Rushdie. The Wizard of Oz. London: British Film Inst., 1992. Print.Google Scholar
Robert, Stam. “The Theory and Practice of Adaptation.” Introduction. Literature and Film: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Film Adaptation. Ed. Stam, and Raengo, Alessandra. Malden: Blackwell, 2005. 1–52. Print.Google Scholar
Laurence, Sterne. The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman. Ed. New, Joan and New, Melvyn. London: Penguin, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Teshigahara, Hiroshi, dir. Woman in the Dunes. Toho, 1964. Film.Google Scholar