Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T15:02:22.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethical Value and Negative Aesthetics: Reconsidering the Baudrillard-Ballard Connection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Bradley Butterfield
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Like today's masses, the characters in J. G. Ballard's Crash are fascinated by what Jean Baudrillard calls the accident, especially when it involves the death of a celebrity. Ballard's characters, however, reenact their accidents as sexual rituals of a marriage between technology and death that are beyond the realm of moral judgment, making Crash sci-fi, hypothetical, unrealistic. Calling Crash “the first great novel of the universe of simulation,” Jean Baudrillard has drawn heavy criticism for missing the alleged moral point, both in Crash and in the still-real world. As a fiction writer, Ballard is given a wide moral berth, but when Baudrillard's theory turns sci-fi, the question of ethical boundaries is broached, and leniency is less likely. In defense of Baudrillard, I read him, like Ballard, in the Nietzschean tradition of a purposefully amoral, negative aestheticism, which I argue is of value to ethics and radical politics in a world governed by instrumental simulacra.

Type
Special Topic: Ethics and Literary Study
Information
PMLA , Volume 114 , Issue 1: Special Topic Ethics and Literary Study Introduction by Lawrence Buell , January 1999 , pp. 64 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Adorno, Theodor W. “Commitment.” Notes to Literature. Vol. 2. Trans. Nicholsen, Shierry Weber. Ed. Tiedemann, Rolf. New York: Columbia UP, 1992. 76–94.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. “Cultural Criticism and Society.” Prisms. Trans. Weber, Samuel and Weber, Shierry. Cambridge: MIT P, 1990. 19–34.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. “The Position of the Narrator in the Contemporary Novel.” Notes to Literature. Vol. 1. Trans. Nicholsen, Shierry Weber. New York: Columbia UP, 1991. 30–54.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Nancy. “Realism.” Surfaces lecture series. U of Oregon. Eugene, OR. 30 Apr. 1998.Google Scholar
Ballard, J. G. Crash. New York: Noonday, 1973.Google Scholar
Ballard, J. G. “Fictions of Every Kind.” Re/Search 8–9 (1984): 98–100.Google Scholar
Ballard, J. G. “Interview with JGB by Andrea Juno and Vale.” Re/Search 8–9 (1984): 6–35.Google Scholar
Ballard, J. G. “Interview with JGB by Graeme Revell.” Re/Search 8–9 (1984): 42–53.Google Scholar
Ballard, J. G. “Introduction to Crash, French Edition.” Re/Search 8–9 (1984): 96–98.Google Scholar
Ballard, J. G. “A Response to the Invitation to Respond.” Science-Fiction Studies 18 (1991): 329.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. Baudrillard Live: Selected Interviews. Ed. Gane, Mike. New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. “Crash.” Baudrillard, Simulacra 111–19.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. The Ecstasy of Communication. Trans. Schutze, Bernard and Schutze, Caroline. New York: Semiotext(e), 1988.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. Jean Baudrillard: Selected Writings. Ed. Mark Poster. Stanford; Stanford UP, 1988.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. “The Precession of Simulacra.” Baudrillard, Simulacra 1–42.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. Simulacra and Simulation. Trans. Glaser, Sheila Faria. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1994.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. Symbolic Exchange and Death. Trans. Grant, Iain Hamilton. London: Sage, 1993.Google Scholar
Carroll, David. Paraesthetics: Foucault, Lyotard, Derrida. New York: Methuen, 1987.Google Scholar
Caserio, Robert L. “Mobility and Masochism: Christine Brooke-Rose and J. G. Ballard.” Novel: A Forum on Fiction 21 (1988): 292–310.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Writing and Difference. Trans. Bass, Alan. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1978.Google Scholar
Foster, Dennis. “J. G. Ballard's Empire of the Senses: Perversion and the Failure of Authority.” PMLA 108 (1993): 519–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gane, Mike. Baudrillard's Bestiary: Baudrillard and Culture. New York: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Gane, Mike. Introduction. Baudrillard, Symbolic Exchange viii–xiv.Google Scholar
Genosko, Gary. Baudrillard and Signs: Signification Ablaze. New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Greenland, Colin. The Entropy Exhibition: Michael Moorcock and the British “New Wave” in Science Fiction. London: RKP, 1983.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. “Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980's.” Feminism/Postmodernism. Ed. and introd. Nicholson, Linda J. New York: Routledge, 1990. 190–233.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. “The Body as an Accumulation Strategy.” Contested Worlds: Comparative Literature and Globalization lecture series. Univ. of Oregon. Eugene, Oregon. 6 Mar. 1997.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine. “The Borders of Madness.” Science-Fiction Studies 18 (1991): 321–23.Google Scholar
Hefner, Robert. “Baudrillard's Noble Anthropology: The Image of Symbolic Exchange in Political Economy.” Substance 17 (1977): 105–13.Google Scholar
Kellner, Douglas. Jean Baudrillard: From Marxism to Postmodernism and Beyond. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. “Revolution in Poetic Language.” The Kristeva Reader. Ed. Moi, Toril. New York: Columbia UP, 1986. 89–136.Google Scholar
Landon, Brooks. “Responding to the Killer B's.” Science-Fiction Studies 18 (1991): 326–27.Google Scholar
Lanz, Joseph. “The Noble Neurotic.” Re/Search 8–9 (1984): 141–43.Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert. Reason and Revolution: Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory. Boston: Beacon, 1960.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. Trans. Halls, W. D. New York: Norton, 1990.Google Scholar
Melville, Herman. Moby-Dick; or, The Whale. Indianapolis: Bobbs, 1964.Google Scholar
Porush, David. “The Architextuality of Transcendence.” Science-Fiction Studies 18 (1991): 323–25.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Nicholas. “Ballard/Crash/Baudrillard.” Science-Fiction Studies 19 (1992): 354–60.Google Scholar
Rushdie, Salman. “Crash.” New Yorker 15 Sept. 1997: 68–69.Google Scholar
Skura, Meredith. “Psychoanalytic Criticism.” Redrawing the Boundaries. Ed. Greenblatt, Stephen and Gunn, Giles. New York: MLA, 1992. 349–73.Google Scholar
Sobchack, Vivian. “Baudrillard's Obscenity.” Science-Fiction Studies 18 (1991): 327–29.Google Scholar