Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T09:26:40.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“L'Allegro” and “Il Penseroso”: Classical Tradition and Renaissance Mythography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Stella P. Revard
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although critics have remarked on the connection of “L'Allegro” and “Il Penseroso” with classical ode and hymn and have identified Mirth as one of the Graces, they have usually approached these poems as re-creative pieces and overlooked the way in which their classical form and the presence of patron goddesses influence their development and meaning. Both poems, however, follow the formula of classical ode and hymn in which a patron deity is invoked and asked for gifts proper for that deity to confer. Because Mirth is the Grace Euphrosyne and Melancholy, as I argue, is the Muse Urania, goddesses associated in antiquity and in the Renaissance with poetical inspiration, Allegro and Penseroso ask their respective goddesses for power to compose poetry. The poems unfold in turn as though the goddesses were infusing their power, Mirth inspiring a light comic vision and Melancholy an epic and tragic mood.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 101 , Issue 3 , May 1986 , pp. 338 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Alcman. Greek Lyric Poetry. Ed. Campbell, David A. London: Macmillan, 1979.Google Scholar
Baudoin, Ioannes. Mythologie ou explication des fables. Paris, 1627.Google Scholar
Boccacius, Joannes [Giovanni Boccaccio]. Genealogie deorum gentilium. Venice, 1492.Google Scholar
Calepinus, Ambrosius. Dictionarium. 2 vols. Venice, 1593.Google Scholar
Callimachus. Hymns and Epigrams. Ed. Mair, C. R. London: Heinemann, 1960.Google Scholar
Cartari, Vincenzo. Le imagine de i dei de gli antichi. Venice, 1571.Google Scholar
Comes, Natalis [Natale Conti]. Mythologiae, sive explicationum fabularum. Libri decem. Venice, 1581.Google Scholar
Conway, Geoffrey S., ed. and trans. The Odes of Pindar. London: Dent, 1972.Google Scholar
Cornutus, Lucius Annaeus. Natura deorum gentilium commentarius. Venice, 1505.Google Scholar
Drayton, Michael. The Works of Michael Drayton. Ed. Hebel, J. William. 5 vols. Oxford: Shakespeare Head, 1931-41.Google Scholar
Evelyn-White, Hugh G., ed. Hesiod, the Homeric Hymns and Homerica. London: Heinemann, 1914.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Harris Francis. The Intellectual Development of John Milton. 2 vols. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1956, 1961.Google Scholar
Fulgentius, Fabius Planciades. Mythologiarum libri tres. Basel, 1556.Google Scholar
Gildersleeve, Basil L., ed. The Olympian and Pythian Odes. By Pindar. London: Macmillan, 1908.Google Scholar
Gyraldus, Lilius Gregorius [Giglio Gregorio Giraldi]. De deis gentium varia et multiplex historia. Basel, 1571.Google Scholar
Gyraldus, Lilius Gregorius [Giglio Gregorio Giraldi]. “De Musis libellus.” Bound with Fabularum liber. By Hyginus. Paris, 1577.Google Scholar
Hesiod. Theogony. Evelyn-White 78–155.Google Scholar
Lagausie, Sieur de. Le Pindare Thebain: Traduction de grec en françois, meslée de vers et de prose. Paris, 1626.Google Scholar
Linocerius, Geofredius [Geoffroi Linocier]. Mythologiae Musarum libellus. Paris, 1583.Google Scholar
Maddison, Carol. Apollo and the Nine: A History of the Ode. London: Routledge, 1960.Google Scholar
Milton, John. Complete Poems and Major Prose. Ed. Hughes, Merritt Y. New York: Odyssey, 1957.Google Scholar
Osgood, Charles Grosvenor. The Classical Mythology of Milton's English Poems. New York: Holt, 1900.Google Scholar
Ovid. Heroides and Amores. Ed. and trans. Grant Showerman. Rev. G. P. Goold. London: Heinemann, 1977.Google Scholar
Parker, William Riley. Milton: A Biography. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1968.Google Scholar
Parker, William Riley. “Review of The Miltonic Setting, Past and Present.” Modern Language Notes 55 (1940): 215–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacham, Henry. “Of Poetrie.” The Compleat Gentleman (1622). Critical Essays of the Seventeenth Century. Ed. Spingarn, J. E. 2 vols. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1963. 1: 116–33.Google Scholar
Pindar. Carmina. Ed. Bowra, C. M. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1935.Google Scholar
Quandt, Guilelmus, ed. Orphei Hymni. Berlin: Weidmannos, 1955.Google Scholar
R⊘stvig, Maren-Sofie. The Happy Man: Studies in the Metamorphosis of a Classical Ideal, 1600-1700. Oslo: Oslo UP; New York: Humanities, 1962.Google Scholar
Sappho. Poetarum Lesbiorum fragmenta. Ed. Lobel, E. and Page, Denys. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1955.Google Scholar
Shafer, Robert. The English Ode to 1660. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1918.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Riverside Shakespeare. Boston: Houghton, 1974.Google Scholar
Shuster, George N. The English Ode from Milton to Keats. New York: Columbia UP, 1940.10.7312/shus93434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spenser, Edmund. Poetical Works. Ed. Smith, J. C. and de Selincourt, E. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1970.Google Scholar
Stephanus, Carolus [Charles Estienne]. Dictionarium historicum, geographicum, poeticum. Iacobus Stoer, 1596.Google Scholar
Theocritus. “The Poems of Theocritus.” The Greek Bucolic Poets. Ed. Edmonds, J. M. London: Heinemann, 1950. 6–381.Google Scholar
Tillyard, E. M. W. “Milton: ‘L'Allegro’ and ‘Il Penseroso.‘” English Association Pamphlet 82 (1932). Rpt. in The Miltonic Setting, Past and Present. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1938. 1–28.Google Scholar
Watson, Sara R. “Milton's Ideal Day: Its Development as a Pastoral Theme.” PMLA 57 (1942): 404–20.Google Scholar
West, Gilbert, trans. Odes of Pindar with Several Other Pieces in Prose and Verse. London, 1749.Google Scholar
Wind, Edgar. Pagan Mysteries in the Renaissance. London: Faber, 1958.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, A. S. P., and Bush, Douglas, eds. The Minor English Poems. New York: Columbia UP, 1972. Vol. 2, pt. 1, of A Variorum Commentary on the Poems of John Milton. 3 vols. to date. 1970–.Google Scholar