Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T06:41:31.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phonology of the Patois of Cachy (Somme)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

Thomas Logie
Thomas Logie*
Affiliation:
Williams College, Williamstown, Mass.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The differences which exist in the spoken language of France in different districts have been caused by two sets of influences, the one arising from a condition already existing before the Latin language was spread over the Gallic territory by the conquering Romans, and the other due to events which occurred after that language had gained a firm footing there. From the variety which exists to-day in the language of any speech district, we are justified in assuming that a like variety existed in the Celtic language of France before the Romans arrived there. The Latin language, coming in contact with a language thus variegated, was necessarily influenced in one part, in a different way from the influence it felt in another part. In this way the Neo-Latin language was broken up into dialects.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 7 , Issue 4: Phonology of the Patois of Cachy (Somme) , 1892 , pp. 101 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1892

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CONSULTED

Adam, Lucien. —Les Patois Lorrains; Nancy and Paris, 1881.Google Scholar
Adam, Lucien. Archivio Glottologico Italiano.Google Scholar
Beyer, Franz. —Franzosische Phonetik, Cothen, 1888,Google Scholar
Beyer, Franz. Le Bonhomme Picard, Amiens.Google Scholar
Burguy, G. F. —Grammaire de la Langue d'Oil. Second Edition. Berlin and Paris, 1889.Google Scholar
Corblet, Jules. —Glossaire Etymologique et Comparatif du Patois Picard. Paris, 1851.Google Scholar
Crinon, Hector. —Satires Picardes. Peronne, 1863.Google Scholar
Corssen, W. —Aussprache des Lateinischen. Second Edition. Leipzig, 1875.Google Scholar
Célèbre Mariage de Jeannain et de Prigne. Saint-Quentin, 1648.Google Scholar
Darmesteter & Hatzfeld. —Le Seizième Siède en France. Second Edition. Paris, 1883.Google Scholar
Diez, F. —Grammatik der Romanischen Sprachen. Fourth Edition. Bonn, 1876.Google Scholar
Diez, F. Etymologisches Worterbuch dcr Romanischen Sprachen. Third Edition. Bonn, 1869.Google Scholar
Forir, H. —Dictionnaire Liègeois-Fran?ais. Liège, 1866.Google Scholar
Forster, W. —Li Chevaliers as devs Espees. Halle, 1877.Google Scholar
Forster, W. Le Franc-Picard, Annuaire de la Somme. Amiens.Google Scholar
Gröber, Gustav. —Grundriss der Romanischen Philologie. Strassburg, 1886–1888.Google Scholar
Horning, Adolf. —Die Ostfranzosischen Grenzdialekte Zwischen Metz und Belfort. Heilbronn, 1887.Google Scholar
Horning, Adolf. Zur Geschichte des Lateinischen c vor e und i im Romanischen. Halle, 1883.Google Scholar
Haase, Hermannus. —Das Verhalten der Pikardischen und Wallonischen Denkmaler des Mittelalters in Bezug auf a und e vor Gedecktem n. Erfurt Dissertation. 1880.Google Scholar
Joret, Charles. —Du c dans les Langues Romanes. Paris, 1874.Google Scholar
Joret, Charles. Des Caractères et de l'Extension du Patois Normand. Paris, 1883.Google Scholar
Jenäer Literaturzeitung.Google Scholar
Jouancoux, J. B. —Glossaire du Patois Picard. Amiens, 1880.Google Scholar
de Jaubert, M. le Cte.—Glossaire da Centre de la France. Second Edition. Paris, 1864.Google Scholar
Le Grand, Pierre. —Dictionnairedu Patois de Lille. Second Edition. Lille, 1856.Google Scholar
Littré, E. —Dictionnaire de la Langue Franchise. Paris, 1874.Google Scholar
La Curne de Sainte-Palaye. —Dictionnaire Historique de l'Ancien Française. Paris, 1875.Google Scholar
Lücking. —Die Aeltesten Franzosischen Mundarten.Google Scholar
Neumann, Fritz. —Zur Laut-und Flexionslehre des Altfranzosischen, Hauptsächlich aus Pikardischen Urkunden von Vermandois. Heilbronn, 1878.Google Scholar
Modern Language Notes. Baltimore: A. M. Elliott, Managing Editor.Google Scholar
Paris, G. —La Vie de Saint Alexis. Paris, 1872.Google Scholar
Paris, E. —Le Saint Evangile selon St. Matthieu, Traduit en Picard Amidnois. Londres, 1863.Google Scholar
Palsgrave, Jean, —Eclaircissement de la Langue Franchise. Edited by F. Génin. Paris, 1852.Google Scholar
Proux, F. Le. —Chartes Franchises du Vermandois de 1218 a 1250. Paris, 1875.Google Scholar
Revue des Patois. Paris.Google Scholar
Romania. Paris.Google Scholar
Romanische Studien. Edited by Böhmer.Google Scholar
Raynaud, G. —Etude sur le Dialecte Picard dans le Ponthieu, in the Bibliothèque de l'Ecole des Chartes. Vol. xxxvii.Google Scholar
Sigart, J. —Dictionnaire du Wallon de Mons. Brussels and Leipzig, 1866.Google Scholar
Skeat. —Principles of English Etymology. First Series. Oxford. 1887.Google Scholar
Sweet. —History of English Sounds. London, 1874.Google Scholar
Suchier, H. —Reimpredigt Halle, 1879.Google Scholar
Suchier, H. Aucassin, et NicolSte. Second Edition. Paderborn, 1881.Google Scholar
Schwan, E. —Grammatik des Altfranzosischen. Leipzig, 1888.Google Scholar
Scheler, Auguste. —Dictionnaire d'Etymologie Franchise. Paris, 1873.Google Scholar
Siemt, O. —Ueber Lateinisches c vor e und i im Pikardischen. Halle, 1881.Google Scholar
Thurot, C. —De la Prononciation Française depuis le Commencement du Seizième Siècle. Paris, 1881.Google Scholar
Tobler, A. —Li Dis dou Vrai Aniel. Second Edition. Leipzig, 1884.Google Scholar
Tarbe, P. —Recherches sur l'Histoire du Langage et des Patois de Champagne. Rheims, 1851.Google Scholar
Ulrich, J. —Rhatoromanische Chrestomathie. Partii. Halle, 1882.Google Scholar
Van Hamel, A. G. —Li Romans de Carité et Miserere du Renclus de Moliens. Paris, 1885.Google Scholar
Vermesse, L. —Dictionnaire du Patois de la Flandre Française ou Wallonne. Douai, 1867.Google Scholar
Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie.Google Scholar