Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T02:31:00.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Romance Captivities in the Context of Crusade: The Prose Lancelot

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Peggy McCracken
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Taking of captives was a common practice in crusade warfare. Although men were more easily ransomed, many women were also taken captive. Women were not combatants on the battlefield, but when the fighting overran crusader camps, women in the camps were likely to be taken. Women were also captured when cities were taken or besieged cities were abandoned by their defenders. Albert of Aachen notes that in 1101 when the crusaders lost the battle at Paphlagonia, they left the undefended women to be captured by their enemies:

The Christians left their tents and all their equipment with all their wagons, with their delicate and beloved wives, with all the goods which are needed by so many nobles and so great an army…. The Turks … cruelly attacked these noble women and eminent matrons, seized them wickedly and held them in fetters, sending over a thousand into barbarous lands where the language was unknown; they plundered them like dumb animals and sent them into perpetual exile … as if they were in a cage or prison. (qtd. in Friedman, “Captivity” 123)

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 124 , Issue 2 , March 2009 , pp. 576 - 582
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Burns, E. Jane. Arthurian Fictions: Rereading the Vulgate Cycle. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 1985. Print.Google Scholar
Jean, Dunbabin. Captivity and Imprisonment in Medieval Europe, 1000–1300. Houndsmills: Palgrave, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Yvonne, Friedman. “Captivity and Ransom: The Experience of Women.” Gendering the Crusades. Ed. Edgington, Susan B. and Lambert, Sarah. Cardiff: U of Wales P, 2001. 121–39. Print.Google Scholar
Yvonne, Friedman. Encounter between Enemies: Captivity and Ransom in the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem. Leiden: Brill, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Yvonne, Friedman. “Women in Captivity and Their Ransom during the Crusader Period.” Cross Cultural Convergences in the Crusader Period: Essays Presented to Aryeh Grabois on His Sixty-Fifth Birthday. Ed. Goodich, Michael, Menache, Sophia, and Schein, Sylvia. New York: Lang, 1995. 75–87. Print.Google Scholar
Given, James B. Inquisition and Medieval Society: Power, Discipline, and Resistance in Languedoc. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
Geraldine, Heng. Empire of Magic: Medieval Romance and the Politics of Cultural Fantasy. New York: Columbia UP, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Sharon, Kinoshita. Medieval Boundaries: Rethinking Difference in Old French Literature. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Lacy, Norris J., gen. ed. Lancelot-Grail: The Old French Arthurian Vulgate and Postvulgate in Translation. 5 vols. New York: Garland, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Lancelot, roman en prose du 13 e siècle. Ed. Micha, Alexandre. 9 vols. Geneva: Droz, 1978–83. Print.Google Scholar
Carolyn, Osiek. “The Ransom of Captives: Evolution of a Tradition.” Harvard Theological Review 74.4 (1981): 365–86. Print.Google Scholar
Strickland, Matthew J. “Killing or Clemency? Ransom, Chivalry and Changing Attitudes to Defeated Opponents in Britain and Northern France, 7–12th Centuries.” Krieg im Mittelalter. Berlin: Akademia, 2001. 93–122. Print.Google Scholar