Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T05:11:52.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thinking beyond Aristotle: The Turn to How in Comparative Rhetoric

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Luming Mao
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Any modest attempt in comparative rhetoric to think beyond aristotle and beyond a single culture is enough to reveal Diversity in the use of language to converse, to instruct, and to persuade and in the concepts and theories developed to inform language practices. Since the publication, in 1971, of Robert Oliver's Communication and Culture in Ancient India and China, one of the early studies that recognized the need for and benefits of studying non-Euro-American rhetorics, comparative rhetoric has made significant advances as interest in moving beyond Euro-American-centrism in studies of rhetoric steadily grows. Comparative rhetoric, committed to different ways of knowing and speaking and to different forms of inquiry, investigates across time and space communicative practices that frequently originate in noncanonical contexts and are often marginalized, forgotten, or erased altogether. Acting in response to globalization, comparative rhetoric aims to transform dominant rhetorical traditions and paradigms. As an interdisciplinary enterprise, it intersects with cognate studies and theories to challenge the prevailing power imbalances and patterns of knowledge production.

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 129 , Issue 3 , May 2014 , pp. 448 - 455
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Ames, Roger T., and Hall, David L., trans. Daodejing: “Making This Life Significant.” New York: Ballantine, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Aristotle. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. Trans. Kennedy, George. New York: Oxford UP, 1991. Print.Google Scholar
Baca, Damián. Mestiz@ Scripts, Digital Migrations, and the Territories of Writing. New York: Palgrave, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Baca, Damián, and Villanueva, Victor, eds. Rhetorics of the Americas, 3114 BCE to 2012 CE. New York: Palgrave, 2010. Print.Google Scholar
Chow, Rey. “The Old/New Question of Comparison in Literary Studies: A Post-European Perspective”. ELH 71 (2004): 289–311. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combs, Steven C. The Dao of Rhetoric. Albany: State U of New York P, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Edbauer, Jenny. “Unframing Models of Public Distribution: From Rhetorical Situation to Rhetorical Ecologies”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 35.4 (2005): 5–24. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. Trans. Smith, A. M. Sheridan. New York: Pantheon, 1973. Print.Google Scholar
Garrett, Mary. “Classical Chinese Conceptions of Argumentation and Persuasion”. Argumentation and Advocacy 29 (1993): 105–15. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Mary. “Some Elementary Methodological Reflections on the Study of the Chinese Rhetorical Tradition”. International and Intercultural Communication Annual 22 (1999): 53–63. Print.Google Scholar
Graham, A. C. Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China. La Salle: Open Court, 1989. Print.Google Scholar
Hall, David L., and Ames, Roger T. Anticipating China: Thinking through the Narratives of Chinese and Western Culture. Albany: State U of New York P, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Hatim, Basil. “A Model of Argumentation from Arabic Rhetoric: Insights for a Theory of Text Types”. British Society for Middle Eastern Studies 17.1 (1990): 47–54. Print.Google Scholar
Kells, Michelle Hall, Balester, Valerie, and Villanueva, Victor, eds. Latino/a Discourses: On Language, Identity, and Literacy Education. Portsmouth: Boynton, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George. Introduction. Aristotle 3–22.Google Scholar
Lipson, Carol S., and Binkley, Roberta A., eds. Ancient Non-Greek Rhetorics. West Lafayette: Parlor, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Lipson, Carol S., and Binkley, Roberta A. Rhetoric before and beyond the Greeks. Albany: State U of New York P, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Keith. “Culture and Rhetorical Patterns: Mining the Rich Relations between Aristotle's Enthymeme and Example and India's Nyāya Method”. Rhetorica 29.1 (2011): 76–105. Print.Google Scholar
Lu, Xing. Rhetoric in Ancient China, Fifth to Third Century B.C.E.: A Comparison with Classical Greek Rhetoric. Columbia: U of South Carolina P, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Lu, Xing. Rhetoric of the Chinese Cultural Revolution: The Impact on Chinese Thought, Culture, and Communication. Columbia: U of South Carolina P, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Lu, Xing. “Studies and Development of Comparative Rhetoric in the U.S.A.: Chinese and Western Rhetoric in Focus”. China Media Research 2.2 (2006): 112–16. Print.Google Scholar
Lyon, Arabella. “Confucian Silence and Remonstration: A Basis for Deliberation?” Lipson and Binkley, Rhetoric 131–45.Google Scholar
Lyon, Arabella. “Rhetorical Authority in Athenian Democracy and the Chinese Legalism of Han Fei”. Philosophy and Rhetoric 41.1 (2008): 51–71. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mailloux, Steven. Disciplinary Identities: Rhetorical Paths of English, Speech, and Composition. New York: MLA, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Mailloux, Steven. “Places in Time: The Inns and Outhouses of Rhetoric”. Quarterly Journal of Speech 92.1 (2006): 53–68. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mao, LuMing. “Beyond Bias, Binary, and Border: Mapping Out the Future of Comparative Rhetoric.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 43.3 (2013): 209–25. Print.Google Scholar
Mao, LuMing. Reading Chinese Fortune Cookie: The Making of Chinese American Rhetoric. Logan: Utah State UP, 2006. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mao, LuMing. “Studying the Chinese Rhetorical Tradition in the Present: Re-Presenting the Native's Point of View”. College English 69.3 (2007): 216–37. Print.Google Scholar
Mao, LuMing. “Writing the Other into Histories of Rhetoric:Google Scholar
Theorizing the Art of Recontextualization.“ Theorizing Histories of Rhetoric. Ed. Ballif, Michelle. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2013. 41–57. Print.Google Scholar
Oliver, Robert T. Communication and Culture in Ancient India and China. Syracuse: Syracuse UP, 1971. Print.Google Scholar
Powell, Malea. “Down by the River; or, How Susan La Flesche Picotte Can Teach Us about Alliance as a Practice of Survivance.” College English 67.1 (2004): 38–60. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Malea. “Dreaming Charles Eastman: Cultural Memory, Autobiography, and Geography in Indigenous Rhetorical Histories”. Beyond the Archives: Research as a Lived Process. Ed. Kirsch, Gesa E. and Rohan, Liz. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2008. 115–27. Print.Google Scholar
Romano, Susan. “‘Grand Convergence’ in the Mexican Colonial Mundane: The Matter of Introduction”. Rhetoric Review 40.1 (2010): 71–93. Print.Google Scholar
Saussy, Haun. “Exquisite Cadavers Stitched from Fresh Nightmares: Of Memes, Hives, and Selfish Genes.” Comparative Literature in an Age of Globalization. Ed. Saussy, . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2006. 3–42. Print.Google Scholar
Schiappa, Edward. Defining Reality: Definitions and the Politics of Meaning. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Stromberg, Ernest. American Indian Rhetorics of Survivance. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 2006. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun-Gi, Jon. “Towards a Rhetoric of Communication, with Special Reference to the History of Korean Rhetoric”. Rhetorica 28.3 (2010): 313–29. Print.Google Scholar
Swearingen, C. Jan. “Plato and Confucius, Aristotle and Mencius: The Perils and Prospects of Comparative Studies in Rhetoric”. International Rhetoric Studies 1 (2011): 278–94. Print.Google Scholar
Swearingen, C. Jan. “Tao Trek: One and Other in Comparative Rhetoric: A Response”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 43.3 (2013): 300–09. Print.Google Scholar
Wang, Bo. “Comparative Rhetoric, Postcolonial Studies, and Transnational Feminisms: A Geopolitical Approach”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 43.3 (2013): 226–42. Print.Google Scholar
Wang, Bo. “Engaging Nuquanzhuyi: The Making of a Chinese Feminist Rhetoric”. College English 72.4 (2010): 385–405. Print.Google Scholar
Watson, Burton, trans. The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu. New York: Columbia UP, 1968. Print.Google Scholar
Wu, Hui. “Alternative Feminist Discourse of Post-Mao Chinese Writers.” Alternative Rhetoric: Challenges to the Rhetorical Tradition. Ed. Gray-Rosendale, Laura and Gruber, Sybille. Albany: State U of New York P, 2001. 219–34. Print.Google Scholar
Wu, Hui. “The Paradigm of Margaret Cavendish: Reading Women's Alternative Rhetorics in a Global Context”. Calling Cards: Theory and Practice in the Study of Race, Gender, and Culture. Ed. Royster, Jacqueline Jones and Simpkins, Ann Marie Mann. Albany: State U of New York P, 2005. 171–86. Print.Google Scholar
You, Xiaoye. Writing in the Devil's Tongue: A History of English Composition in China. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2010. Print.Google Scholar