Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T20:18:36.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Un-American: Refugees and the Vietnam War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Yogita Goyal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Viet thanh nguyen always insists that he is a refugee, not an immigrant, and that his novel the sympathizer is a war novel rather than an immigrant story (“Viet Thanh Nguyen”). In an era when the refugee has become the epicenter of debates about extreme nationalism and closed borders, the distinction between refugee and immigrant demands further parsing. Nguyen states the difference clearly when he contrasts the refugee, rendered stateless and vulnerable by persecution or catastrophe, to the immigrant, whose mobility reaffirms existing narratives of bounded territories. “Immigrant studies,” he writes, “affirms the nation-states the immigrant comes from and settles into; refugee studies brings into question the viability of the nation- state” (“Refugee Memories” 930).

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 133 , Issue 2 , March 2018 , pp. 378 - 383
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Agamben, Giorgio. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Translated by Heller-Roazen, Daniel, Stanford UP, 1995.Google Scholar
Du Bois, W.E.B. he Souls of Black Folk. 1903. Oxford UP, 2007.Google Scholar
Ellison, Ralph. Invisible Man. Vintage Books, 1947.Google Scholar
Espiritu, Yen Lê. “Toward a Critical Refugee Study: he Vietnamese Refugee Subject in US Scholarship.” Journal of Vietnamese Studies, vol. 1, nos. 1–2, Feb. and Aug. 2016, pp. 410–33.Google Scholar
“Figures at a Glance.” UNHRC: he UN Refugee Agency, 19 June 2017, www.unhcr.org/en-us/figures-at-a-glance.html.Google Scholar
Gordon, Avery. Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination. U of Minnesota P, 1997.Google Scholar
Morrison, Toni. Beloved. Vintage Books, 1987.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Viet hanh. Nothing Ever Dies: Vietnam and the Memory of War. Harvard UP, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, Viet hanh. “Pacific Rim and Asian American Literature.” he Cambridge Companion to Transnational American Literature, edited by Goyal, Yogita, Cambridge UP, 2017, pp. 190–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, Viet hanh. Race and Resistance: Literature and Politics in Asian America. Oxford UP, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, Viet hanh. “Refugee Memories and Asian American Critique.” Positions, vol. 20, no. 3, 2012, pp. 911–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, Viet hanh. The Refugees. Grove Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Viet hanh. The Sympathizer. Paperback ed., Grove Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Viet hanh. “Viet hanh Nguyen on Being a Refugee, an American—and a Human Being.” The Financial Times, 3 Feb. 2017, www.ft.com/content/0cd9f69a-e89e-11e6-967b-c88452263daf.Google Scholar
Schlund-Vials, Cathy J. “The Subjects of 1975: Delineating the Necessity of Critical Refugee Studies.” MELUS, vol. 41, no. 3, Fall 2016, pp. 199–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minh-ha, Trinh T. When the Moon Waxes Red: Representation, Gender, and Cultural Politics. Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar