Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T22:21:35.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

American Studies without Exceptions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Michael Bérubé
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Scholars in American studies are generally skeptical of the notion of working within or for the nation-state, for three primary reasons: the alleged eclipse of the nation-state by multinational capitalism, the undesirability of limiting American studies parochially to the study of the United States, and the history of collusion between United States intellectuals and the Central Intelligence Agency during the cold war. This essay argues that although contemporary American studies has done well to reject the American exceptionalism that once defined the field and is rightly averse to engaging in covert international propaganda operations, scholars in American studies need to ask whether the field's rejection of the nation-state might not coincide with rather than resist the movements of global capital and thus to reconsider the importance of the state (in the United States and elsewhere) as a site of intellectual engagement and activism.

Type
Special Topic: America: The Idea, the Literature
Information
PMLA , Volume 118 , Issue 1: Special Topic: America: The Idea, the Literature , January 2003 , pp. 103 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Barbara Brinson, Curiel, et al. Introduction. Rowe 1–21. Denning, Michael. “‘The Special American Conditions’: Marxism and American Studies.” American Quarterly 38 (1986): 356–80.Google Scholar
Jane C., Desmond, and Domínguez, Virginia R. “Resituating American Studies in a Critical Internationalism.” American Quarterly 48 (1996): 475–90.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Ari. Press briefing. White House, Washington. 7 May 2001. The White House. Transcript. 29 July 2002 <http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/briefings/20010507.html>..>Google Scholar
Lipsitz, George. American Studies in a Moment of Danger. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2001.Google Scholar
Miyoshi, Masao. “Ivory Tower in Escrow.” Boundary 2 27.1 (2000): 7–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Association of Scholars. Losing the Big Picture: The Fragmentation of the English Major since 1964. Princeton: Natl. Assn. of Scholars, 2000.Google Scholar
Radway, Janice. “What's in a Name? Presidential Address to the American Studies Association, 20 November, 1998.” American Quarterly 51 (1999): 1–32.10.1353/aq.1999.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogin, Michael. “When the CIA Was the NEA.” Nation 12 June 2000: 16+.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth-Century America. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1997.Google Scholar
John Carlos, Rowe. ed. Post-nationalist American Studies. Berkeley: U of California P, 2000.Google Scholar
Frances Stonor, Saunders. The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters. New York: New, 2000.Google Scholar
Sharlet, Jeff. “Tinker, Writer, Artist, Spy: Intellectuals during the Cold War.” Chronicle of Higher Education 31 Mar. 2000: A19–20.Google Scholar