Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T02:28:03.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improvising Rules in the Book of Ruth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Jan Wojcik
Jan Wojcik*
Affiliation:
Purdue UniversityWest Lafayette, Indiana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The biblical book of Ruth is a succinct, intricate love story powered by five intense dialogues. It is a story about language and literature as well as about love. The characters find all three as generously available as the grains of barley on which Boaz and Ruth pledge their troth. Boaz, Ruth, and Naomi draw on a rich common store of literary allusions and laws derived from Hebrew literary tradition to create a happy ending for the sterile stories of their individual pasts. The liberties they take with known biblical and Hebraic law have long puzzled scholars trying to place the story in its precise historical or cultural context. But I argue that the book was never intended to represent a time and place, that it celebrates the creative improvisations religious rules are meant to inspire in any time or place.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 100 , Issue 2 , March 1985 , pp. 145 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Alter, Robert. The Art of Biblical Narrative. New York: Basic, 1981.Google Scholar
Burrows, Millar. “The Marriage of Boaz and Ruth.” Journal of Biblical Literature 59 (1940): 445–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Edward F. Jr. Ruth: A New Translation with Introduction, Notes and Commentary. New York: Doubleday, 1975.Google Scholar
Gerleman, Gillis. Ruth: Das Hohelied. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener, 1965.Google Scholar
Rauber, D. F. “Literary Values in the Bible: The Book of Ruth.” Journal of Biblical Literature 89 (1970): 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, H. H. “The Marriage of Ruth.” Harvard Theological Review 40.1 (1947): 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasson, Jack M. Ruth: A New Translation with a Philological Commentary and a Formalist-Folklorist Interpretation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Wood, Geoffrey E. “Ruth.” Jerome Biblical Commentary. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice, 1968. 603–09.Google Scholar