Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-14T07:24:29.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Resistance of Effi Briest: An (Un)told Tale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Valerie D. Greenberg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rereading the canon in the light of recent theory and criticism can turn into a subversive project when one finds that a novel long considered easily accessible and safely categorized may be neither. Such is the outcome of this essay's reading of Theodor Fontane's popular Effi Briest (1894–95). Incomplete stories in the text lead to a reassessment of its ending, of the heroine's position, and of the text's political implications. What emerges is a modern, self-reflexive, incipiently feminist Effi Briest that resists the standard readings and instead moves closer to “shocking” texts of the time (such as Wedekind's first Lulu play and Freud's Studies on Hysteria) than to those texts with which it is traditionally compared.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 103 , Issue 5 , October 1988 , pp. 770 - 782
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Avery, George C. “The Chinese Wall: Fontane's Psychograph of Effi Briest.” Views and Reviews of Modern German Literature: Festschrift for Adolf D. Klarmann. Ed. Weimar, Karl S. München: Delp, 1974. 18–38.Google Scholar
Bauer, Uwe. “Zur Rezeption der Effi Briest von Theodor Fontane.” Jahrbuch der Raabe-Gesellschaft. Ed. Josef Daum, Hans-Jürgen Schrader, and Schultz, Werner. Braunschweig: Waisenhaus, 1975. 7–15.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. Krapp's Last Tape and Embers. London: Faber, 1959.Google Scholar
Bernheimer, Charles, and Kahane, Claire, eds. In Dora's Case: Freud, Feminism, Hysteria. Gender and Culture. New York: Columbia UP, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boone, Joseph A. “Modernist Maneuverings in the Marriage Plot: Breaking Ideologies of Gender and Genre in James's The Golden Bowl.” PMLA 101 (1986): 374–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Nicholas, and Swales, Martin, eds. Realism in European Literature: Essays in Honour of J. P. Stern. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1986.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, Richard. Theodor Fontane: Über die Verbindlichkeit des Unverbindlichen. 2nd ed. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Peter. Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative. New York: Knopf, 1984.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan. On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism after Structuralism. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Demetz, Peter. Formen des Realismus: Theodor Fontane. München: Hanser, 1964.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Trans. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1976.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1983.Google Scholar
Ermarth, Elizabeth. “Fictional Consensus and Female Casualties.” Heilbrun and Higonnet 1–18.Google Scholar
Fontane, Theodor. L'Adultera. Theodor Fontane: Sämtliche Werke. Ed. Keitel, Walter. Sec. 1. Vol. 2. München: Hanser, 1962. 7–140. 3 secs. 1962–.Google Scholar
Fontane, Theodor. Briefe an Georg Friedlaender. Ed. Schreinert, Kurt. Heidelberg: Quelle, 1954.Google Scholar
Fontane, Theodor. Effi Briest. Trans. Parmée, Douglas. Middlesex: Penguin, 1967.Google Scholar
Fontane, Theodor. Effi Briest. Theodor Fontane: Sämtliche Werke. Ed. Keitel, Walter. Sec. 1. Vol. 4. München: Hanser, 1963. 7–296. 3 secs. 1962–.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. Studien über Hysterie. Gesammelte Werke. 5th ed. Ed. Freud, Anna. Vol. 1. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer, 1977. 75–312. 18 vols.Google Scholar
Furst, Lilian R. “Madame Bovary and Effi Briest.” Romantisches Jahrbuch 12 (1961): 124–35.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Sandra M., and Gubar, Susan. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. New Haven: Yale UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Glaser, Horst Albert. “Theodor Fontane: Effi Briest (1894). Im Hinblick auf Emma Bovary and andere.” Romane und Erzählungen des Bürgerlichen Realismus Ed. Denkler, Horst. Stuttgart: Reclam, 1980. 362–77.Google Scholar
Heilbrun, Carolyn G., and Higonnet, Margaret R. The Representation of Women in Fiction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Higonnet, Margaret R. Introduction. Heilbrun and Higonnet xiii–xxii.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. “Interaction between Text and Reader.” The Reader in the Text. Ed. Suleiman, Susan R. and Crosman, Inge. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1980. 106–19.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1981.Google Scholar
Jamison, Robert L. “The Fearful Education of Effi Briest.” Monatshefte 74 (1982): 20–32.Google Scholar
Johnson, Barbara. The Critical Difference: Essays in the Contemporary Rhetoric of Reading. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Kermode, Frank. The Classic: Literary Images of Permanence and Change. New York: Viking, 1975.Google Scholar
Kuzniar, Alice A. Delayed Endings: Nonclosure in Novalis and Hölderlin. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1987.Google Scholar
MacArthur, Elizabeth J. “Devious Narratives: Refusal of Closure in Two Eighteenth-Century Epistolary Novels.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 21 (1987): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, Thomas. “Anzeige eines Fontane-Buches.” Reden und Aufsätze Vol. 10 of Thomas Mann: Gesammelte Werke. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer, 1960. 573–84. 13 vols.Google Scholar
Martin, Wallace. Recent Theories of Narrative. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1986.Google Scholar
Meese, Elizabeth A. Crossing the Double-Cross: The Practice of Feminist Criticism. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 1986.Google Scholar
Mende, Dirk. “Frauenleben: Bemerkungen zu Fontanes L'Adultera nebst Exkursen zu Cécile und Effi Briest.” Fontane aus heutiger Sicht. Ed. Aust, Hugo. München: Nymphenburger, 1980. 183–213.Google Scholar
Miller, D. A. Narrative and Its Discontents: Problems of Closure in the Traditional Novel. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1981.Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis. “The Problematic of Ending in Narrative.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 33 (1978): 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minden, Michael. “Effi Briest and ‘die historische Stunde des Takts.‘” Modern Language Review 76 (1981): 869–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Klaus-Detlef. Bürgerlicher Realismus: Grundlagen und Interpretationen. Königstein/Ts.: Athenäum, 1981.Google Scholar
Müller-Seidel, Walter. “Fontanes Effi Briest: Zur Tradition des Eheromans.” Wissenschaft als Dialog: Studien zur Literatur und Kunst seit der Jahrhundertwende. Ed. von Heydebrand, Renate and Just, Klaus Günther. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1969. 30–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller-Seidel, Walter. Theodor Fontane: Soziale Romankunst in Deutschland. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1975.Google Scholar
Norris, Christopher. Deconstruction: Theory and Practice. London: Methuen, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulsen, Wolfgang. “Zum Stand der heutigen Fontane-Forschung.” Jahrbuch der deutschen Schillergesellschaft 25 (1981): 474–508.Google Scholar
Preisendanz, Wolfgang. Wege des Realismus. München: Fink, 1977.Google Scholar
Rainer, Ulrike. “Effi Briest und das Motiv des Chinesen: Rolle und Darstellung in Fontanes Roman.” Zeitschrift für deutsche Philologie 101 (1982): 545–61.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, Hartmut. “Die Wahrheit des Sentimentalen.” Wirkendes Wort 5 (1979): 318–26.Google Scholar
Richter, Karl. Resignation: Eine Studie zum Werk Theodor Fontanes. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1966.Google Scholar
Ropohl, Udo, and Tebbe, Krista, eds. Theodor Fontane: Dichtung und Wirklichkeit. Berlin: Gerike, 1981.Google Scholar
Schafarschik, Walter, ed. Erläuterungen und Dokumente: Theodor Fontane Effi Briest. Stuttgart: Reclam, 1972.Google Scholar
Schnitzler, Arthur. Liebelei. Das dramatische Werk. Vol. 1. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1977. 215–64. 8 vols.Google Scholar
Schuster, Ingrid. “Exotik als Chiffre: Zum Chinesen in Effi Briest.” Wirkendes Wort 33 (1983): 115–25.Google Scholar
Schuster, Peter-Klaus. Theodor Fontane: Effi Briest—Ein Leben nach christlichen Bildern. Studien zur deutschen Literatur 55. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Showalter, Elaine. The New Feminist Criticism: Essays on Women, Literature, and Theory. New York: Pantheon, 1985.Google Scholar
Smith, John H. “Dialogic Midwifery in Kleist's Marquise von O and the Hermeneutics of Telling the Untold in Kant and Plato.” PMLA 100 (1985): 203–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solms, Wilhelm. “Effi und Innstetten: ‘Ein Musterpaar‘?” Germanisch-romanische Monatsschrift 35 (1985): 189–208.Google Scholar
Stern, J. P. Re-Interpretations: Seven Studies in Nineteenth-Century German Literature. London: Thames, 1964.Google Scholar
Subiotto, Frances M. “The Ghost in Effi Briest.” Forum for Modern Language Studies 21 (1985): 137–50.Google Scholar
Swales, Erika. “Private Mythologies and Public Unease: On Fontane's Effi Briest.” Modern Language Review 75 (1980): 114–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swales, Martin. “The Problem of Nineteenth-Century German Realism.” Boyle and Swales 68–84.Google Scholar
Tanner, Tony. Adultery in the Novel: Contract and Transgression. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Thum, Reinhard H. “Symbol, Motif and Leitmotif in Fontane's Effi Briest.” Germanic Review 54 (1979): 115–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgovnick, Marianna. Closure in the Novel. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1981.Google Scholar
Utz, Peter. “Effi Briest, der Chinese und der Imperialismus: Eine ‘Geschichte’ im geschichtlichen Kontext.” Zeitschrift für deutsche Philologie 103 (1984): 212–25.Google Scholar
Viering, Jürgen. “‘In welcher Welt der schauderhaften Widersprüche leben wir!’ Überlegungen zum ‘Zeitroman’ bei Fontane und Spielhagen am Beispiel von Fontanes Effi Briest und Spielhagens Zum Zeitvertreib.” Literatur und Sprache im historischen Prozeß. Ed. Cramer, Thomas. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1983. 329–49.Google Scholar
Walter-Schneider, Margret. “‘Personen, die nicht da waren, wissen immer alles am besten’: Bemerkungen zum Realismus in Fontanes Romanen.” Zeitschrift für deutsche Philologie 104 (1985): 223–44.Google Scholar
Wedekind, Frank. Erdgeist. Tragödien. München: Goldmann, 1980. 7–81.Google Scholar
Weisser, Michael. Die Frau in der Reklame: Bild- und Textdokumente aus den Jahren 1827–1930. Münster: Coppenrath, 1981.Google Scholar