Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T11:29:41.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scripts, Sequences, and Stories: Elements of a Postclassical Narratology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

David Herman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay begins by differentiating between narratively organized sequences of events and nonnarrative sequences associated with deductive reasoning, conversational exchanges, descriptions, and recipes. After reviewing classical accounts of narrative sequences, the essay sketches developments in language theory and cognitive science that have occurred after the heyday of structuralist narrative poetics and that throw further light on two interlinked questions: what is necessary to make a sequence of events a narrative, and what makes some narrative sequences more readily processed as stories than others? Both questions can be addressed by the concept, drawn from artificial-intelligence research, of “scripts”—knowledge representations storing finite, sequentially ordered groups of actions required for the accomplishment of particular tasks. Exploring some literary applications of a theoretical model based on scripts, the final section of the text outlines research strategies for a postclassical narratology that encompasses cognitive approaches to stories. By examining different modalities of the script-story interface, theorists of narrative may be able to rethink the historical development of narrative techniques and to understand better the differences among narrative genres at any given time.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 112 , Issue 5 , October 1997 , pp. 1046 - 1059
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Barnes, Djuna. Nightwood. New York: New Directions, 1961.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland “Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narratives.” Image Music Text. Trans. Heath, Stephen. New York: Hill, 1977. 79–124.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. S/Z. Trans. Miller, Richard. New York: Hill, 1974.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Frederick. Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1932.Google Scholar
Bobrow, Daniel G., and Norman, Donald A. “Some Principles of Memory Schemata.” Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science. Ed. Bobrow and Collins, Allan. New York: Academic, 1975. 131–13.Google Scholar
Bremond, Claude “The Logic of Narrative Possibilities.” New Literary History 11 (1980): 387–411.Google Scholar
Bremond, Claude. Logique du récit. Paris: Seuil, 1973.Google Scholar
Bruce, Bertram “What Makes a Good Story?” Language Arts 55 (1978): 460–46.Google Scholar
Buck, R A. “Reading Forster's Style: Face Actions and Social Scripts in Maurice.” Style 30 (1996): 69–94.Google Scholar
Charles, May “A Postmodern Challenge to Reference-World Construction: Gilbert Sorrentino's Mulligan Stew.” Style 29 (1995): 235–23.Google Scholar
Charniak, Eugene, and McDermott, Drew. Introduction to Artificial Intelligence. Reading: Addison, 1985.Google Scholar
Chatman, Seymour. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1978.Google Scholar
Crevier, Daniel. AI: The Tumultuous History of the Search for Artificial Intelligence. New York: Basic, 1993.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan “Defining Narrative Units.” Style and Structure in Literature: Essays in the New Stylistics. Ed. Fowler, Roger. Oxford: Blackwell, 1975. 121–12.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan. Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics, and the Study of Literature. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diderot, Denis. Jacques the Fatalist. Trans. Henry, Michael. London: Penguin, 1986.Google Scholar
Lubomír, Doležel “From Motifemes to Motifs.” Poetics 4 (1972): 55–90.Google Scholar
Emmott, Catherine “Frames of Reference: Contextual Monitoring and the Interpretation of Narrative Discourse.” Advances in Written Text Analysis. Ed. Coulthard, Malcolm. London: Routledge, 1994. 157–15.Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan “On Defining the Theme in Functional Sentence Analysis.” Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1 (1964): 267–26.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Trans. Lewin, Jane E. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. Narrative Discourse Revisited. Trans. Lewin, Jane E. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1988.Google Scholar
Gerrig, Richard J. Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading. New Haven: Yale UP, 1993.Google Scholar
Giora, Rachel, and Shen, Yeshayahu “Degrees of Narrativity and Strategies of Semantic Reduction.” Poetics 22 (1994): 447–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greimas, Algirdas Julien. Structural Semantics: An Attempt at a Method. Trans. Daniele McDowell, Ronald Schleifer, and Velie, Alan. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1983.Google Scholar
Grishman, Ralph. Computational Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendricks, William O “On the Notion ‘beyond the Sentence.‘” Linguistics 37 (1967): 12–51.Google Scholar
Herman, David “Autobiography, Allegory, and the Construction of Self.” British Journal of Aesthetics 35 (1995): 351–35.Google Scholar
Herman, David “Hypothetical Focalization.” Narrative 2 (1994): 230–23.Google Scholar
Herman, David “Textual You and Double Deixis in Edna O'Brien's A Pagan Place.” Style 28 (1994): 378–410.Google Scholar
Herman, David. Universal Grammar and Narrative Form. Durham: Duke UP, 1995.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis. Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. Trans. Whitfield, Francis J. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1969.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis “La stratification du language.” Word 10 (1954): 163–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1978.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Paul S, and Lisa F. Rau. “Innovations in Text Interpretation.” Artificial Intelligence 63 (1993): 143–14.Google Scholar
Jahn, Manfred “Frames, Preferences, and the Reading of Third-Person Narratives: Towards a Cognitive Narratology.” Poetics Today (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Kafalenos, Emma “Lingering along the Narrative Path: Extended Functions in Kafka and Henry James.” Narrative 3 (1995): 117–11.Google Scholar
Labov, William “The Transformation of Experience in Narrative Syntax.” Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1972. 354–35.Google Scholar
Labov, William, and Waletzky, Joshua “Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience.” Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts. Ed. Helm, June. Seattle: U of Washington P, 1967. 12–44.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude “The Structural Study of Myth.” Critical Theory since 1965. Ed. Adams, Hazard and Searle, Leroy. Gainesville: U Presses of Florida, 1986. 809–80.Google Scholar
Linde, Charlotte. Life Stories: The Creation of Coherence. New York: Oxford UP, 1993.Google Scholar
MacBride, Maud Gonne. A Servant of the Queen. Suffolk: Boydell, 1983.Google Scholar
Mandler, Jean M., and Johnson, Nancy S. “Remembrance of Things Parsed: Story Structure and Recall.” Cognitive Psychology 9 (1977): 111–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Wallace. Recent Theories of Narrative. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1986.Google Scholar
Mercadal, Dennis. A Dictionary of Artificial Intelligence. New York: Van Nostrand, 1990.Google Scholar
Milne, A. A. Winnie-the-Pooh. New York: Dutton, 1926.Google Scholar
Minsky, Marvin “A Framework for Representing Knowledge.” The Psychology of Computer Vision. Ed. Winston, Patrick. New York: McGraw, 1975. 211–21.Google Scholar
Minsky, Marvin. The Society of Mind. New York: Touchstone: 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavel, Thomas G. The Poetics of Plot: The Case of English Renaissance Drama. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1985.Google Scholar
Plotnitsky, Arkady “Complementarity, Idealization, and the Limits of Classical Conceptions of Reality.” South Atlantic Quarterly 94 (1995): 527–52.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F “Toward a Taxonomy of Given-New Information.” Radical Pragmatics. Ed. Cole, Peter. New York: Academic, 1981.223-56.Google Scholar
Prince, Gerald “Aspects of a Grammar of Narrative.” Poetics Today 1 (1980): 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Gerald. A Dictionary of Narratology. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1987.Google Scholar
Prince, Gerald. Narratology: The Form and Functioning of Narrative. Berlin: Mouton, 1982.Google Scholar
Propp, Vladimir. Morphology of the Folktale. 2nd ed. Trans. Scott, Laurence. Austin: U of Texas P, 1968.Google Scholar
Robbe-Grillet, Alain. La jalousie. Paris: Minuit, 1957.Google Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure. Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence, and Narrative Theory. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1991.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. Nausea. Trans. Alexander, Lloyd. New York: New Directions, 1964.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. La nausée. Paris: Gallimard, 1938.Google Scholar
Schank, Roger C. Tell Me a Story: A New Look at Real and Artificial Memory. New York: Scribner's, 1990.Google Scholar
Schank, Roger C., and Abelson, Robert P. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1977.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. Approaches to Discourse. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1994.Google Scholar
Scholes, Robert. Structuralism in Literature: An Introduction. New Haven: Yale UP, 1974.Google Scholar
Segre, Cesare “From Motif to Function and Back Again.” Thematics: New Approaches. Ed. Bremond, Claude, Landy, Joshua, and Pavel, Thomas. Albany: State U of New York P, 1995. 21–32.Google Scholar
Smith, Barbara Herrnstein, and Plotnitsky, Arkady “Introduction: Networks and Symmetries, Decidable and Undecidable.” South Atlantic Quarterly 94 (1995): 371–37.Google Scholar
Stein, Nancy L “The Definition of a Story.” Journal of Pragmatics 6 (1982): 487–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. The Poetics of Prose. Trans. Howard, Richard. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1977.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A “Episodes as Units of Discourse Analysis.” Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk. Ed. Tannen, Deborah. Washington: Georgetown UP, 1981. 177–17.Google Scholar
Wilensky, Robert “Story Grammars Revisited.” Journal of Pragmatics 6 (1982): 423–42.Google Scholar
Wright, Richard. Native Son. New York: Perennial-Harper, 1993.Google Scholar