No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Seducer as Friend: The Disappearance of Sex as a Sign of Conquest in Les liaisons dangereuses
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 October 2020
Abstract
Lex liaisons dangereuses neither celebrates pure cynicism nor confirms Rousseauesque sentiment. Instead, the problem that this novel traces takes the form of a question: how is it possible to reconcile the desire for power, in the form of seduction, with the desire to overcome power in friendship? The answer to this question is embedded in the relationship between Valmont and Merteuil, who develop a new model for friendship, one that is merged with seduction. Because sex does not turn out to be a sign of conquest in the relationship between seducers, conquest can begin to operate invisibly. Les liaisons dangereuses points toward the emergence of a new representational possibility—that of invisible conquest—in the literary history of seduction.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2001
References
Works Cited
Baudrillard, Jean. Seduction. Trans. Brian Singer. New York: St. Martin's, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlant, Lauren. “Intimacy: A Special Issue.” Intimacy. Ed. Berlant. Spec. issue of Critical Inquiry 24.2 (1998): 281–88.Google Scholar
Blum, Carol. “Styles of Cognition as Moral Options in La nouvelle Héloïse and Les liaisons dangereuses.” PMLA 88 (1973): 289–98.Google Scholar
Brooks, Peter. The Novel of Worldliness. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1969.10.1515/9781400874835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, Patrick. “The Valmont-Merteuil Relationship: Coming to Terms with the Ambiguities of Laclos' Text.” Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 266 (1989): 373–409.Google Scholar
Debaisieux, Martine. “Translating the Marquise de Merteuil.” Romantic Review 78 (1987): 461–70.Google Scholar
DeJean, Joan. Literary Fortifications: Rousseau, Laclos, Sade. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “The Politics of Friendship.” Journal of Philosophy 85 (1988): 632–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. The Politics of Friendship. Trans. George Collins. New York: Verso, 1997.Google Scholar
Denis, Diderot. La religieuse. Œuvres. Bibliothèque de la Pléiade. Paris: Gallimard, 1951. 235–393.Google Scholar
Duranton, Henri. “Les liaisons dangereuses ou le miroir ennemi.” Revue des sciences humaines 153 (1974): 125–43.Google Scholar
Faderman, Lillian. Surpassing the Love of Men: Romantic Friendship and Love between Women from the Renaissance to the Present. New York: Morrow, 1981.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Frances. “Rape and the Rise of the Novel.” Representations 20 (1987): 88–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “Friendship as a Way of Life.” Ethics, Subjectivity, and Truth: Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984. Ed. Rabinow, Paul. Trans. Robert Hurley. New York: New, 1997.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality. Vol. 1. Trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Vintage, 1990.Google Scholar
Girard, René. Deceit, Desire, and the Novel: The Self and Other in Literary Structure. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1965.Google Scholar
Goodman, Dena. The Republic of Letters: A Cultural History of the French Enlightenment. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1994.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, Thomas. “Educating Women: Laclos and the Conduct of Sexuality.” The Ideology of Conduct: Essays in Literature and the History of Sexuality. Ed. Armstrong, Nancy and Tennenhouse, Leonard. New York: Methuen, 1987. 142–59.Google Scholar
Laclos, Choderlos de. Les liaisons dangereuses. Œuvres complètes. Bibliothèque de la Pléiade. Paris: Gallimard, 1951.5-399.Google Scholar
Langer, Ullrich. Perfect Friendship: Studies in Literature and Moral Philosophy from Boccaccio to Corneille. Geneva: Droz, 1994.Google Scholar
Lenz Jakob Michael, Lenz. Der Hofmeister oder Vorteile der Privaterziehung. Werke und Briefe in drei Bänden. Vol. 1. Leipzig: Insel, 1987. 41–123.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. Love as Passion: The Codification of Intimacy. Trans. Jeremy Gaines and Doris L. Jones. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Marian, Dawn. “The Ends of Seduction; or, Libertines, Respectable Folk, Vampires, and Harassers.” Diss. U of Chicago, 2000.Google Scholar
Miller, Nancy K. “The Exquisite Cadavers: Women in Eighteenth-Century Fiction.” Diacritics 5.4 (1975): 37–43.10.2307/464963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molière, . Don Juan, ou le festin de pierre. Œuvres complètes. Paris: Seuil, 1962. 286–316.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. “De l'amitié.” Essais de Montaigne. Vol. 1. Paris: Garnier, 1962. 197–212.Google Scholar
Plato. “Symposium.” The Collected Dialogues. Ed. Hamilton, Edith and Cairns, Huntington. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1961. 526–74.Google Scholar
Richardson, Samuel. Clarissa: or, the History of a Young Lady. New York: Penguin, 1985.Google Scholar
Rothfield, Lawrence. Vital Signs: Medical Realism in Nineteenth-Century Fiction. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saint-Amand, Pierre. “The Power of Evil: Laclos. Les liaisons dangereuses.” The Libertine's Progress: Seduction in the Eighteenth-Centurv French Novel. Trans. Jennifer Curtiss Gage. Hanover: Brown UP, 1994. 97–113.Google Scholar
Shannon, Laurie J. “Emilia's Argument: Friendship and ‘Human Title’ in The Two Noble Kinsmen.” ELH 64 (1997): 657–82.10.1353/elh.1997.0027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, Tony. Adultery and the Novel: Contract and Transgression. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1979.Google Scholar