Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T23:35:10.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Amchitka Island, Alaska: moving towards long term stewardship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

Jennifer L. Benning ,
David L. Barnes ,
Joanna Burger  and
John J. Kelley
Jennifer L. Benning
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Water and Environmental Research Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 245 Duckering Building, PO Box 755900, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775-5900, USA
David L. Barnes
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Water and Environmental Research Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 245 Duckering Building, PO Box 755900, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775-5900, USA
Joanna Burger
Affiliation:
Division of Life Sciences, Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, and Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation, Rutgers University, 604 Allison Rd, Nelson Hall, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854-8082, USA
John J. Kelley
Affiliation:
Institute of Marine Science, School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 235 Irving II Building, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775-7220, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Amchitka Island, Alaska, is a historical underground nuclear test site. Three underground tests were conducted there by the United States Atomic Energy Commission, now US Department of Energy (USDOE), between 1965 and 1971. These were Long Shot, an 80 kiloton detonation; Milrow, a 1 megaton detonation; and Cannikin, a 5 megaton detonation. Subsequent to these tests, several scientific assessments have been conducted regarding the impacts of the tests on the terrestrial and marine environments surrounding the island. However, many citizens and groups still voice concerns over the potential for detrimental effects on human and ecological health. In its responsibility for the long term protection of human and ecological health consequent to its nuclear programme, USDOE has recently prepared a plan for the long term surveillance and monitoring of the site. The purpose of this paper is to summarise the history of the island, specifically with regards to its use as a nuclear test site, to summarise the results of investigative activities following testing, to summarise USDOE's plan for surveillance and monitoring, and to offer the authors' viewpoints on the long term stewardship of the island. The authors deemed the stewardship plan to be essentially protective of human and ecological health; however, they recommend a stronger commitment to site oversight and review, as well as to future research, for addressing uncertainties remaining at the island.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 133 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benning, J.L. 2008. The effects of scale and spatial heterogeneities on aqueous phase diffusion in fractured rock. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Alaska Fairbanks: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.Google Scholar
Breechbill, R.A. 1977. Status of the Norway rat. In: Merritt, M.L., and Fuller, R.G. (editors). The environment of Amchitka island, Alaska. Washington DC: Technical Information Center, Energy Research and Development Administration (NVO-79): 261–268.Google Scholar
Bernstein, J.Z., Lungren, D.E., Brooke, E.W., Drinan, R.F., Flemming, A.S., Goldberg, A.J., Gromoff, I.V., Marutani, W.M., and Mitchell, H.B. (editors). 1982. Personal justice denied, report of the Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians. Washington DC: United States Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians.Google Scholar
Burger, J. 2000. Integrating environmental restoration and ecological restorations: long-term stewardship at the Department of Energy. Environmental Management 26 (5): 469–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burger, J. 2001. Stewardship and future land use at a Department of Energy site: does self-interest determine ratings? Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part A 63 (5): 383–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, J. 2007. A model for selecting bioindicators to monitor radionuclide concentrations using Amchitka Island in the Aleutians as a case study. Environmental Research 105: 316–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, J., and Gochfeld, M.. 2001. Stewardship and the US Department of Energy: encompassing ecosystem protection. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 44 (4): 437–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Kosson, D.S.. Powers, C.W., Friedlander, B., Eichelberger, J., Barnes, D., Duffy, L.K., Jewett, S.C., and Volz, C.D.. 2005. Science, policy, and stakeholders: Developing a consensus science plan for Amchtika Island, Aleutians, Alaska. Environmental Management 35 (5): 557–568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burger, J., Mayer, H.J., Greenberg, M., Powers, C.W., Volz, C.D., and Gochfeld, M.. 2006a. Conceptual site models as a tool in evaluating ecological health: the case of the Department of Energy's Amchitka Island nuclear test site. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part A 69:1217–1238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Burke, S., Jeitner, C.W., Jewett, S., Snigaroff, D., Snigaroff, R., Stamm, T., Harper, S., Hoberg, M., Chenelot, H., Patrick, R., Volz, C.D., and Weston, J.. 2006b. Do scientists and fisherman collect the same sample size fish? Implications for risk assessment. Environmental Research 101: 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, J., Jewett, S., Gochfeld, M., Hoberg, M., Harper, S., Chenelot, H., Jeitner, C., and Burke, S.. 2006c. Can biota sampling for environmental monitoring be used to characterize benthic communities in the Aleutians? Science of the Total Environment 369: 393–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Powers, C.W., Kosson, D.S., Halverson, J., Siekaniec, G., Morkill, A., Patrick, R., Duffy, L.K., and Barnes, D.. 2007a. Scientific research, stakeholders, and policy: continuing dialogue during research on radionuclides on Amchitka Island, Alaska. Journal of Environmental Management 85: 232–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., and Jewett, S.C.. 2007b. Selecting species for marine assessment of radionuclides around Amchtika: planning for diverse goals and interests. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 123: 371–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., and Jewett, S.C. 2007c. Radionuclide levels in invertebrates from Amchitk and Kiska Islands in the Aleutian chain, Alaska. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 128: 329–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Kosson, D.S., Powers, C.W., Jewett, S., Friedlander, B., Chenelot, H., Volz, C.D., and Jeitner, C.. 2007d. Radionuclides in marine macroalgae from Amchitka and Kiska Islands in the Aleutians: establishing a baseline for future biomonitoring. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 91: 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Kosson, D.S., Powers, C.W., Friedlander, B., Stabin, M., Favret, D., Jewett, S., Snigaroff, D., Snigaroff, R., Stamm, T., Weston, J., Vol, D., and Jeitner, C.. 2007e. Radionuclides in marine fishes and birds from Amchitka and Kiska Islands in the Aleutians: establishing a baseline. Health Physics 92: 265–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Kosson, D.S., Powers, C.W. 2007f. A biomonitoring plan for assessing potential radionuclide exposure using Amchitka Island in the Aleutian chain of Alaska as a case study. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 98: 315–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Snigaroff, R., Snigaroff, D., Stamm, T., Jeitner, C., and Burke, S.. 2007g. Mercury levels and potential risk in subsistence foods from the Aleutians. Science of the Total Environment 384: 93–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burkett, R.D. 1977. Limnology. In: Merritt, M.L., and Fuller, R.G. (editors). The environment of Amchitka island, Alaska. Washington DC: Technical Information Center, Energy Research and Development Administration (NVO-79): 269–286.Google Scholar
Buske, N., and Miller, P.. 1998. Nuclear flashback part two: the threat of the U.S. nuclear complex. Anchorage, Alaska: Nuclear-Weapons-Free America and Alaska Community Action on Toxics.Google Scholar
Carr, W.J., Gard, L.M., Bath, G.D., and Healey, D.L.. 1971. Earth-science studies of a nuclear test area in the western Aleutian Islands, Alaska: An interim summary of results. Geological Society of American Bulletin 82: 699–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castagnola, D.C. 1969. Tritium anomalies on Amchitka Island, Alaska, Part I. Palo Alto, California: Atomic Energy Commission (report NVO-1229–113).Google Scholar
Claassen, H.C. 1978. Hydrologic processes and radionuclide distribution in a cavity and chimney produced by the Cannikin nuclear explosion, Amchitka Island, Alaska. Washington DC: U.S. Geological Survey. (Geological Survey professional paper 712-D).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasher, D., Hanson, W., Read, S., Faller, S., Farmer, D., Efurd, W., Kelley, J., and Patrick, R.. 2002. An assessment of the reported leakage of anthropogenic radionuclides from the underground nuclear test sites at Amchitka Island, Alaska, USA to the surface environment. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 60: 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichelberger, J.C., Freymueller, J., Hill, G., and Patrick, M.. 2002. Nuclear stewardship: lessons from a not-so-remote island. Geotimes 4: 20–23.Google Scholar
Faller, S.H., and Farmer, D.E.. 1997. Long-term hydrologic monitoring program, Amchitka, Alaska. Las Vegas, Nevada: United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA report EPA-402-R-98–002).Google Scholar
Fenske, P.R. 1972. Event related hydrology and radionuclide transport at the Cannikin Site, Amchitka Island, Alaska. Las Vegas, Nevada: Desert Research Institute, Center for Water Resources Research, (report 45001, NVO-1253–1).Google Scholar
Fetter, C.W. 2001. Applied Hydrogeology. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
Fuller, R.G., and Kirkwood, J.B.. 1977. Ecological consequences of nuclear testing. In: Merritt, M.L., and Fuller, R.G. (editors). The environment of Amchitka island, Alaska. Washington DC: Technical Information Center, Energy Research and Development Administration (NVO-79): 627–650.Google Scholar
Garfield, B. 1995. The thousand-mile war, World War II in Alaska and the Aleutians. Fairbanks, Alaska: University of Alaska Press.Google Scholar
Hassan, A., Pohlmann, K., and Chapman, J.. 2002. Modelling groundwater flow and transport of radionuclides at Amchitka Island's underground nuclear tests; Milrow, Long Shot and Cannikin. Las Vegas, Nevada: Desert Research Institute (DOE/NV/11508–51).Google Scholar
Hassan, A., and Chapman, J.. 2006. Verification and uncertainty reduction of Amchitka underground nuclear testing models. Las Vegas, Nevada: Desert Research Institute (DOE/NV/13609–46).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency International Advisory Committee). 1998a. The radiological situation at the atolls of Mururoa and Fangataufa. Volume 3, inventory of radionuclides underground at the atolls. Vienna: IAEA.Google Scholar
IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency International Advisory Committee). 1998b. The radiological situation at the atolls of Mururoa and Fangataufa. Summary report. Vienna: IAEA.Google Scholar
Kohlhoff, D.M. 2002. Amchitka and the bomb: nuclear testing in Alaska. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Lebednik, P.A., and Palmisano, J.F.. 1977. Ecology of marine algae. In: Merritt, M.L., and Fuller, R.G. (editors). The environment of Amchitka island, Alaska. Washington DC: Technical Information Center, Energy Research and Development Administration (NVO-79): 353–394.Google Scholar
McCarthy, A.P. 1977. Prehistoric human occupation of the Rat Islands. In: Merritt, M.L., and Fuller, R.G. (editors). The environment of Amchitka island, Alaska. Washington DC: Technical Information Center, Energy Research and Development Administration (NVO-79): 59–114.Google Scholar
McKeown, F.A., Young, R.A., Williams, W.P., and Brethauer, G.E.. 1967. Long Shot-3, geologic effects of the Long Shot explosion, Amchitka Island, Alaska. Denver, Colorado: US Geological Survey for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (technical letter 20 March 1967).Google Scholar
Merritt, M.L. 1977a. Geographic setting. In: Merritt, M.L., and Fuller, R.G. (editors). The environment of Amchitka island, Alaska. Washington DC: Technical Information Center, Energy Research and Development Administration (NVO-79): 1–12.Google Scholar
Merritt, M.L. 1977b. History, 1741–1967. In: Merritt, M.L., and Fuller, R.G. (editors). The environment of Amchitka island, Alaska. Washington DC: Technical Information Center, Energy Research and Development Administration (NVO-79): 115–140.Google Scholar
Merritt, M.L.., and Fuller, R.G. (editors). 1977. The environment of Amchitka island, Alaska. Washington DC: Technical Information Center, Energy Research and Development Administration (NVO-79).Google Scholar
Miller, P., and Buske, N.. 1996. Nuclear flashback: the return to Amchitka. Washington DC: Greenpeace, USA.Google Scholar
NRC (National Research Council). 2000. Long-term institutional management of U.S. Department of Energy legacy waste sites. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Norris, R.S., and Arkin, W.M.. 1998. NRDC nuclear notebook known nuclear tests worldwide, 1945–98. Bulletin of Atomic Scientists 54: 65–67.Google Scholar
Pletnikoff, K. 2008. Amchitka watch program. 11–15 February 2008. Anchorage, Alaska: Alaska Forum on the Environment.Google Scholar
Polar Research Board. 1996. The Bering Sea ecosystem. Washington DC: Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources, National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Powers, C.W., Burger, J., Kosson, D., Gochfeld, M., and Barnes, D. (editors). 2005. Amchitka independent science assessment: biological and geophysical aspects of potential radionuclide exposure in the Amchitka marine environment. Piscataway, New Jersey: CRESP (Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation II).Google Scholar
Powers, C.W., Burger, J., Kosson, D., and Gochfeld, M. (editors). 2006. Selecting radiological data for bioindicator selection. Addendum to the 2005 independent science assessment. Piscataway, New Jersey: CRESP (Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation II).Google Scholar
Robbins, A., Makhijani, A., and Yih, K.,1991. Radioactive heaven and earth – the health and environmental effects of nuclear weapon testing in, on and above the earth. New York: Apex Press.Google Scholar
Seymour, A.H., and Nelson, V.A.. 1977. Radionuclides in air, water, and biota. In: Merritt, M.L., and Fuller, R.G. (editors). The environment of Amchitka island, Alaska. Washington DC: Technical Information Center, Energy Research and Development Administration (NVO-79): 579–613.Google Scholar
Simenstad, C.A., Isakson, J.S., and Nakatani, R.E.. 1977. Marine fish communities. In: Merritt, M.L., and Fuller, R.G. (editors). The environment of Amchitka island, Alaska. Washington DC: Technical Information Center, Energy Research and Development Administration (NVO-79): 451–492.Google Scholar
STGWG (State and Tribal Government Working Group). 1999. Closure for the seventh generation. Washington DC: National Conference of State Legislatures.Google Scholar
Unsworth, M., Soyer, W., Tuncer, V., Wagner, A., and Barnes, D.. 2007. Case history, hydrogeologic assessment of the Amchitka Island nuclear test site (Alaska) with magnetotellurics. Geophysics 72 (3): B47–B57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USAEC (US Atomic Energy Commission). 1972. Project Cannikin, D+30 day report, preliminary operational and test results summary. Las Vegas, Nevada: United States Atomic Energy Commission, Nevada Operations Office (report NVO-108).Google Scholar
US Census Bureau. 2006. US Census Bureau. American fact finder. Alaska. Atka city, Alaska. 2006 population estimates. US Census Bureau. URL: http://www.census.gov (accessed June 2008).Google Scholar
US Census Bureau. 2007. US Census Bureau. American fact finder. Alaska – borough or census area. 2007 population estimates. US Census Bureau 1 July 2007. URL: http://www.census.gov (accessed June 2008).Google Scholar
US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. 1989. The containment of underground nuclear explosions. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office (OTA-ISC-414).Google Scholar
USDOE (United States Department of Energy). 1998. Amchitka Island, Alaska, potential US Department of Energy site responsibilities. Las Vegas, Nevada: USDOE Nevada Operations Office (DOE/NV-526).Google Scholar
USDOE (United States Department of Energy). 1999. From cleanup to stewardship. Washington DC: USDOE Office of Environmental Management (DOE/EM-0466).Google Scholar
USDOE (United States Department of Energy). 2001. Long-term stewardship study, Volume I – report, final study. Washington DC: USDOE Office of Environmental Management, Office of Long Term Stewardship.Google Scholar
USDOE (United States Department of Energy). 2006. Subsurface completion report for Amchitka underground nuclear test sites: Long Shot, Milrow, and Cannikin. Las Vegas, Nevada: Nevada Operations Office. (DOE/NV-1106-REV.1).Google Scholar
USDOE (United States Department of Energy). 2008. Long-term surveillance and maintenance plan for the U.S. Department of Energy Amchitka, Alaska, site. Grand Junction, Colorado: Office of Legacy Management (DOE/LM/GJ1131–2008).Google Scholar
USGS (United States Geological Survey). 2003a. Magnitude 7.1. Rat Islands, Aleutian Islands. United States Geological Survey, 17 March 2003. URL: http://neictest.cr.usgs.gov/neis/eq_depot/2003/eq_030317/ (accessed June 2008).Google Scholar
USGS (United States Geological Survey). 2003b. Magnitude 7.8. Rat Islands, Aleutian Islands, Alaska. United States Geological Survey, 17 November 2003. URL: http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eq_depot/2003/eq_031117 (accessed June 2008).Google Scholar
USGS (United States Geological Survey). 2008. Magnitude 7.2 Andreanof Islands, Aleutian Islands, Alaska. United States Geological Survey, 19 December 2007. URL: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/eqinthenews/2007/us2007lcaq/ (accessed June 2008).Google Scholar
United States, Public Law. 1971. Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act 92–203 (85 Stat. 688; date 18 December 1971). Text from: United States public laws. Available from: LexisNexis® congressional (accessed: 24 July 2008).Google Scholar
United States, Public Law. 1980. Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act 96–487 (94 Stat. 2371; Date: 2 December 1980). Text from: United States public laws. Available from: LexisNexis® congressional (accessed 24 July 2008).Google Scholar
Valdez, R.A., Helm, W.T., and Neuhold, J.M.. 1977. Aquatic ecology. In: Merritt, M.L., and Fuller, R.G. (editors). The environment of Amchitka island, Alaska. Washington DC: Technical Information Center, Energy Research and Development Administration (NVO-79): 287–314.Google Scholar
Wagner, A.M. 2007. Using geophysical constraints to determine groundwater travel times, seafloor arrival locations, and saltwater concentrations for transition zone depths at underground nuclear detonations on Amchitka Island. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Alaska Fairbanks. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.Google Scholar
White, C.M., Williamson, F.S.L., and Emison, W.B.. 1977. Avifaunal investigations. In: Merritt, M.L., and Fuller, R.G. (editors). The environment of Amchitka island, Alaska. Washington DC: Technical Information Center, Energy Research and Development Administration (NVO-79): 227–260.Google Scholar
Wheatcraft, S.W. 1995. Sea water intrusion model of Amchitka Island, Alaska. Las Vegas, Nevada: Nevada Operations Office, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE/NV/10845–59).CrossRefGoogle Scholar